S.VAIDYANATHAN, R.VIJAYAKUMAR
Secretary to Government Home Department, Chennai – Appellant
Versus
B. Amaravathi (Widow) – Respondent
JUDGMENT :-
S. Vaidyanathan, & Rvijayakumar, JJ.
(Prayer: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent, to set aside the order, dated 16.10.2019 made in W.P.No.29547 of 2019 and allow this writ appeal.)
The respondents in the writ petitions are the appellants herein.
2. The Government of Tamil Nadu issued G.O.Ms.No.400 Home (Police XV) Department dated 07.06.2012 sanctioning 558 additional posts of Sweepers in the Police Department. As per the said G.O., a special time scale of pay of Rs.1300-3000+ Grade Pay of Rs.300/- would be paid to the appointed Sweepers. Further, it was stated that the 558 additional posts are sanctioned by surrendering the existing 219 regular posts of Sweepers in the Police Department. Pursuant to the said Government Order, the writ petitioners were appointed in the special time scale of pay. The appointment order of the writ petitioners clearly indicated that their appointments are purely temporary until the same is regularised by the Government. The writ petitioners were issued the order of regularization on various dates and granted regularization from the date of their original appointments. The probation period was also declared by the District Leve
State of Punjab and others Vs. Jagjit Singh and others
Sabha Shanker Dube Vs. Divisional Forest Officer and others
Union of India and others Vs. A.S.Pillai and others)
State of Rajasthan and others Vs.Dayalal and others)
Padmasundara Rao (Dead) & others vs. State of Tamil Nadu and others
Lord Morris in Herrington vs. British Railways Board (1972) 2 WLR 537
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.