Back
Ramaniyam Real Estates Private Ltd. , Chennai – Appellant
Versus
Spencer’s Retail Limited, Rep. by its Authorised Signatory, Murali – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Prayer: Civil Suit has been filed under Order IV Rule 1 of O.S.Rules r/w Order VII, Rule 1 of C.P.C., pleased to pass a judgment and decree as under:-
(b) Mandatory Injunction directing the Defendant to issue public notice in all leading daily news papers seeking apology to the plaintiff for causing damage to the reputation of the Plaintiff’s Company by instituting false case.
(c) To Award cost of the plaintiff in this suit.
(d) pass such further or other orders as this Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case and thereby render justice.
1. The present suit was filed by the plaintiff seeking for the relief of monetary compensation, directing the respondent to pay a sum of Rs.4,61,42,148/- together with future interest at the rate of 24% from the date of filing the suit till the date of realization under the heads:
(b) rental loss, and;
(c) compensat
A tenant must prove actual damages to recover claimed amounts from the landlord; failure to substantiate losses results in dismissal of claims, except for the advance refundable amount.
A party to a contract is entitled to damages for expenses incurred due to the other party's breach, especially when proper communication of contract termination is not made.
The delay in construction and its attribution influenced the court's decision, leading to the invalidity of the lease termination and dismissal of the counter-claim for refund of advance money.
Contracts involving illegal agreements are void, and parties must restore benefits received under such agreements.
The subsequent construction contracts superseded the original memorandum of understanding, and the defendants' possession was illegal as they failed to complete the construction as per the contract.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the interpretation of the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956, governing the security deposit, refund, and interest, influenced the court's ....
Plaintiffs failed to provide sufficient evidence of defamation and damages, resulting in dismissal of their case.
A company struck off under Section 248 (5) of the Companies Act, 2013 may be rendered -dormant- for all other purposes, the ‘certificate of incorporation’ is ‘specifically’ and ‘statutorily preserved....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
