SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Mad) 2936

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
K. MURALI SHANKAR, J.
G. Thomas - Appellant
Versus
The Superintendent of Police, Central Bureau of Investigation - Respondent
CRL.O.P.(MD).No.13508 of 2020 and CRL.M.P.(MD)No.6199 of 2020 and CRL.M.P.(MD)No.868 of 2021
Decided on : 11-03-2021

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr.Issac Mohanlal M/s. Issac Chambers
For the Respondent: Mrs.Victoria Gowri, Assistant Solicitor General

Headnote:

Criminal Procedure code, 1973 - Section 482 – Indian Penal code, 1860 - Sections 120B r/w 406 - Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 13(2) r/w 13(1) (d) - Employees' Provident Funds Scheme, 1952 - Section 7 A, 68 BD - Seeking to quash F.I.R - Unknown officials of Employees Provident Fund Organisation, entered into a criminal conspiracy with first petitioner and in pursuance of said conspiracy, public servants abusing their official position caused pecuniary advantage to 2nd petitioner's society, in mater of release of EPF amount and amount was misused, causing loss to Government Exchequer - Though proceedings under 7A of EPFO Act was pending for defaulting payment of contribution in Provident Fund amount, claim was submitted by 2nd petitioner's society was processed, sanctioned and amount was credited into account of second petitioner – Held, very filing of FIR was under misconception that when 7 A proceeding was pending, amount was claimed and sanctioned and that petitioners have not utilised sanctioned amount for purpose for which, amount was sanctioned - In FIR, there is no whisper that petitioners had committed any act of misappropriation of sanctioned fund nor transferred land purchased for their own use or in favour of any other person unconnected with second petitioner's society - Respondents have miserably failed to show any basis or foundation upon which, FIR was registered for alleged offences - There are absolutely no grounds for proceeding against petitioners and that allegations levelled in FIR do not make out any offences and as such FIR, is liable to be quashed - Criminal Original Petition allowed.

ORDER :

1. The Criminal Original Petition has been filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., seeking to quash the F.I.R., registered in Crime No.RC2292020A0007 of 2020, dated 12.11.2020 on the file of the respondents.

2. The facts that are necessary for deciding the present case are as follows:

a) The Government of India through its Ministry of Housing and Urban Poverty Alleviation had introduced a scheme called “Prime Minister's Awas Yojana Scheme” to provide subsidy for construction of house for the homeless poor citizens of India. In order to extend the benefits under the Prime Minister's Awas Yojana scheme, Central Government had inserted a new provision Para 68BD in the Employees' Provident Fund Scheme, vide Gazette Notification No. G.S.R. 351(E), dated 12.04.2017, extending the scheme benefits to the homeless provident fund subscribers. The Additional Central Provident Fund Commissioner directed all the Regional Provident Fund Commissioners to give wide publication of the EPFO Housing scheme through circular, dated 21.04.2017. As per the directions of the office of the Central Provident Fund Commissioner, the Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner EPF Organisation, SRO, Tirunelveli contacted the first petitioner, who was then serving as HR in the M/s. St.John's Freight System limited, Tuticorin and requested to commence the scheme for the welfare of the employees of that company.

b) M/s. St.John's Freight System limited, Tuticorin is a company carrying out business on engaging in multiple service providers in Logistic and Shipping Industry. The first petitioner, who was then serving as Senior Assistant General Manager HR has canvassed before the employees of the said company and initially 25 employees expressed their interest in joining the scheme and later almost 160 employees have expressed their readiness to join as members of the society to be formed. After giving necessary intimation to the Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner, Tirunelveli, the first petitioner formed a society and got it registered on 17.07.2017 in the office of the District Registrar, Tuticorin in the name and style of M/s. St.John Employees Welfare Society. As per the terms of the scheme, the society, after opening a bank account in its name at Vijaya Bank, Tuticorin, had submitted the individual application forms of the members to the EPF Officer, Tirunelveli. After approval of the applications of 141 members of the society, a sum of Rs.1,50,14,600/- was sanctioned and subsequently, another sum of Rs.34,36,300/- was sanctioned, all totalling Rs.1,84,50,900/- and the same was credited into the bank account of the 2nd petitioner society.

c) After sanctioning of the amount and crediting the same into the 2nd petitioner society, FIR came to be registered for the offences punishable under Sections 120B r/w Section 406 IPC and under Sections 13(2) r/w 13(1) (d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, alleging that during the period 2017-2019 unknown officials of EPF, Tirunelveli, entered into criminal conspiracy with the first petitioner and in pursuance of the same, the public servants abusing their official position, caused pecuniary advantage to the 2nd petitioner society, represented by the first petitioner, in the matter of release of EPF amount and amount was misused, thereby causing loss to the Government Exchequer. It is necessary to refer the 3rd paragraph in the body of the FIR, which refers to the allegations and accusations made against the petitioners;

    “Information revealed that M/s. St.John Freight System Limited, Tuticorin formed a housing society in the name of St.John's Employees Welfare Society. Proceedings U/s. 7A of EPFO Act was pending against M/s.St.John Freight System Ltd., Tirunelveli which is represented by A-1 Shri. G.Thomas, for defaulting the payment of contribution in the PF amount. Though the proceeding was pending, the claim submitted by the Society A-2 on behalf of 141 members, was processed, sanctioned and amount of Rs.1,84,50,600

              Click Here to Read the rest of this document
              1
              2
              3
              4
              5
              6
              7
              8
              9
              10
              11
              SupremeToday Portrait Ad
              supreme today icon
              logo-black

              An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

              Please visit our Training & Support
              Center or Contact Us for assistance

              qr

              Scan Me!

              India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

              For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

              whatsapp-icon Back to top