ORDER :

While C.R.P.(MD)No.1688 of 2011 arose out of the petition for impleading in I.A.No.107 of 2010 filed in O.S.No.9 of 2009 on the file of the Principal District Judge, Virudhunagar at Srivilliputhur, C.R.P. (MD)No.1140 of 2013 arose out of a petition in I.A.No.620 of 2010 in O.S.No.266 of 2003 on the file of the District Munsif, Aruppukottai.

2. The suit in O.S.No.9 of 2009 was filed by three daughters of one Sivasubramaniya Muthaliyar, claiming that the suit properties numbering about 6 items belonged to the Sivasubramaniya Muthaliyar, as his ancestral properties and on his death on 04.01.2006, the plaintiffs being the daughters would be entitled to 1/6 share each as per the provisions of Section 29-A of the Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 1990. In the said suit, apart from adding their siblings as defendants 1 to 3, the plaintiffs also had impleaded defendants 4 to 11 who had purchased the properties from either Sivasubramaniya Muthaliar or the defendants 2 and 3 who are the sons.

3. The suit is being resisted by the petitioners herein who are defendants 4 and 5, contending that the properties purchased by them are the absolute properties of Sivasubramaniya Muthaliar and the