M.SUNDAR
Panneerselvam – Appellant
Versus
Bhoopathi – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Captioned main second appeal i.e., S.A.No.475 of 2019 has been listed before this Virtual Court under the cause list caption 'NOTICE OF MOTION'.
2. Mr. S.Udayakumar, learned counsel of M/s. Karan and Uday (Law Firm) on behalf of appellant (defendant in the Court of first instance i.e., trial Court) and Mr.V.V.Sathya, counsel on record for lone respondent (plaintiff in the Court of first instance i.e., trial Court) are before this Virtual Court.
3. The proceedings of Hon'ble predecessor Judge on 27.03.2019 when the captioned second appeal and C.M.P were first listed reads as follows:
Private notice is also permitted.
Post on 24.04.2019.
There shall be an order of interim stay till then.'
4. A perusal of the above proceedings makes it clear that no substantial question of law has been formulated and the second appeal has not been admitted. This Court is informed that the captioned second appeal has therefore been listed now under the cause list caption 'NOTICE OF MOTION'.
5. As of today, the age of the lis which has led to the captioned second appeal is 9 years and in a few i.e., less than eight months from now it will be a dec
Allampati Subba Reddy alias Subbarami Reddy Vs. Neelapareddi Ramana Reddy
Padma Sundara Rao Vs. State of Tamil Nadu case reported in (2002) 3 SCC 533
Herrington v. British Railways Board [(1972) 2 WLR 537 : 1972 AC 877 (HL)
Sir Chunilal V.Mehta and Sons Ltd., Vs. Century Spinning and Manufacturing Co. Ltd.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.