IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
A.D. JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J.
K. Jayaraman & Others - Appellant
Vs.
State by: Assistant Commissioner of Police, Chennai & Another - Respondent
Crl.O.P.No. 4130 of 2014 & M.P.Nos. 1 to 3 of 2014
Decided On : 29-03-2021
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Section 482, 174, 227 and 155(2) – Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Section 304, (2) and 299 - Cyclonic Storm - Vessels - Drowned And Died - Whether death of victims was due to omission or commission of acts by petitioners - Whether from available materials placed before it, offence alleged against accused is made out or not with a view to proceed further in this case - Whether charges against petitioner of having committed an offence under Section 304(2) IPC has been properly laid or not – Held, Incident had happened due to grounding of Vessel and capsizing of lifeboat, petitioners cannot even be remotely expected to have intention and knowledge that such an incident will happen due to which victims will loose their lives - Death cannot be attributed to act of non supply of provisions by them and non compliance of terms of agreement between A1, owners of Vessel and petitioners employer - Petitioners cannot be remotely made liable for incident - Prosecution has not brought in any material to establish that there was proximity between acts of commission / omission of petitioners herein and death of crew members of Vessel, that is to say that acts of petitioners are causa causans for death of victims - Petition allowed.
JUDGMENT :
Prayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code to call for the records in P.R.C.No.135 of 2013 from the file of the learned IX Metropolitan Magistrate, Saidapet, Chennai, in Crime No.4592 of 2012 on the file of the respondent and to quash the same.
Challenging the proceedings in P.R.C.No.135 of 2013 on the file of the learned IX Metropolitan Magistrate, Saidapet, Chennai, the present petition has been filed.
2. The brief background leading to filing of charge sheet is as follows: On 30.10.2017, the Port of Madras raised a signal for a cyclonic storm named “Nilam” with Signal-7 signifying great danger and thereby directed all vessels in the anchorage to move to open sea. On 31.10.2017 at about 10.15 hrs vessel Pratibha Cauvery started to drag on the starboard anchorage. Though the captain of the ship had ordered to lower the shackles and move the vessel full ahead with all its engines operated, the vessel proceeded towards the land shore. When the vessel was close to the shore, the captain ordered the crew to abandon the ship. 22 crew members boarded a life boat. But however, the life boat capsized and six of the crew members therein drowned and died. In connection with this incident, a complaint came to be registered in Cr.No.4592 of 2012 on the file of the first respondent herein which culminated into framing of the impugned charge sheet for offence u/s.304(ii) IPC wherein the petitioners herein have been arrayed as A11, A12 and A13.
3. The case of the prosecution is as follows: On 25.09.2012, the ship named “MT. Pratibha Cauvery” arrived at Chennai Port from Budge Budge Port, Kolkatta under IOC Charter for unloading light diesel oil. After discharging the cargo, the vessel was directed by the Port Authorities at Chennai to move to the outer anchorage and wait for further orders from the Authorities of the Shipping Department. On 08.10.2012, the vessel came to inner anchorage for receiving provisions and stores and remained in the inner anchorage till 11.10.2012. On 28.10.2012, the vessel became disabled since the bunker Marine Gas Oil (MGO) was critically lower. On 30.10.2012, the Port of Madras raised a signal for cyclonic storm and requested all vessels to move out of the port and go to outer anchorage. Since the vessel was dragging her anchorage, the captain had tried for tug assistance for taking the vessel outside the port limit. However, the vessel drifted to 5 Nautical mile distance from the land and got grounded. The captain had sought for assistance of boat for towing the ship from Chennai VTS. Since no boat was sent for about 35 minutes, he had ordered for lowering the life boat at 15.00 hrs, with the knowledge that the life boat engine was not working for the past three months. The captain ordered the crew members to abandon the ship and 22 crew members boarded the life boat and when the life boat was lowered to the water level, it capsized and out of the 22 crew members, 16 crew members were rescued and the remaining six got drowned in the sea and died. On receipt of the complaint, the first respondent herein initially registered a case in Crime No.4592 of 2012 under Section 174 Cr.P.C., on 31.10.2012 at 23.50 hrs. Since the preliminary investigation revealed the case to be one of culpable homicide not amounting to murder causing the death of crew members due to the deliberate failure of the employees of the A1’s Company and others, the respondent herein had altered the Section from 174 Cr.P.C., to Section 304(2) of IPC on 26.11.2012.
4. The petitioners herein have been arrayed as A11, A12, A13 respectively. A1 in this case is the Shipping Company. A2 to A7 are the Directors of the Shipping Company. A8 & A9 are the “Designated Persons Ashore” of the Company. A10 is the Technical Superintendent of the Shipping Company. The petitioners are the employees of M/s.Sea
Shanthi Bhai. J. Vaghela & Another V. State of Gujarat & Others)
Amanullah and another V. State of Bihar and Others
Shankar Narayan Bhadolkar V. State of Maharastra reported in 2005 (9) SCC 71
Rajwant and Anr. v. State of Kerala
Virsa Singh v. State of Punjab
Rukmini Narvekar vs. Vijaya Satardekar and others reported in 2008 (14) SCC 1
Amanullah and another V. State of Bihar and Others reported in (2016) 6 SCC 699
SupremeToday
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.