BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
N. SATHISH KUMAR, J.
Kulalar Peravai, Registered Society (R.No.2/92), Represented by its Secretary, Dindigul & Others - Appellant
Versus
A.S.S. Nataraj & Others - Respondent
S.A. (MD) Nos. 251 & 438 of 2012 & C.M.P. (MD) Nos. 6830 of 2019 & M.P. (MD) Nos. 1 & 1 of 2014 & 2 of 2012
Decided On : 31-03-2021
Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Section 52 - Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act – Section 6 (15 to 17 ) – Civil Procedure Code, 1908 - Order 1 Rule 8 - Property - Charitable Purpose - Declaration And Granting Permanent Injunction - Declaration And Recovery Of Possession - Whether property was absolutely dedicated for charitable purpose by particular community or not - Whether there is absolute dedication or not – Held, Documents now sought to be filed is only a printed invitations said to have been issued by temple, which are subsequent to proceedings and printed during pendency of appeal - Therefore, merely on basis of those documents, right of parties cannot be decided in second appeal - If such documents are allowed to be part of record, there may not be any end to litigation - Additional documents are invitations said to have been printed in year 2011 - Perusal of invitation indicates that while describing mandagapadi there is some differences - Therefore, mere some difference in printing and giving a different name in respect of Kulalar Community, that will not make any differences - However, those documents are not at all relevant to decide main issue i.e., to find out whether there is absolute dedication or not, therefore, documents now sought to be filed are only after thought and cannot be received at this stage - If these types of documents are received, litigations will be prolonged endlessly - Appeal dismissed.
JUDGMENT :
Prayer: These Second Appeals are filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code, against the judgment and decree dated 24.09.2010 in A.S.No.4 of 2006 on the file of the Fast Track Court, Dindigul modifying and partially confirming the judgment and decree dated 27.12.2005 in O.S.No.348 of 1993 on the file of the Principal Subordinate Court, Dindigul.
1. Aggrieved over the concurrent findings of the Courts below dismissing the suit for declaration and granting permanent injunction for a certain period S.A.(MD)No.251 of 2012 has been filed by the plaintiff. S.A. (MD)No.438 of 2012 is filed by the purchaser /defendants in the suit, of the property as against the decree and judgment of the appellate Court granting permanent injunction for three days to conduct charitable purpose in the suit property.
2. For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred to herein, as per their rank before the Trial Court.
3. The brief facts, leading to the filing of this Appeal Suit, are as follows:-
(ii) A.Subban Chettiar also filed a suit in O.S.No.60 of 1925 along with the community people against the tenants. The said A.Subban Chettiar had never exercised any individual rights over the suit property. After the death of A.Subban Chettiar, his son, namely A.S.Subban Chettiar, with the consent of all Kulalar Community people, was conducting mandagapadi trust. He has sold a small portion measured to an extent of 1 ½ feet north to south and 95 feet east to west with the consent of the community people for a sum of Rs.300/- to one Sabthagiri Dhesigachari. Even in the partition entered between the members of the A.Subban Chettiar, the suit property has not been included, since the same was dedicated to the Community. After the death of A.Subban Chettiar, as the family is in rich and influential position out of due respect for them, the Kulalar Community allowed the suit property be maintained by the defendants 1 to 3 and other sons of late. A.Subban Chettiar as trustees. The mandagapadi trust is being performed now by the defendants 1 to 6 as trustees/managers. Mandagapadi festival has been conducted by the donations received from the community
Jagan Singh (dead) through Lrds vs. Dhanwanti and another (2012) 2 SCC 628
Nilgiri District Janatha Party rep. by its Secretar vs. A.Rahim and three others
The Assistant Commissioner and others vs. Nattamai K.s.Ellappa Mudaliar and others AIR 1987 MAD 187
Sappani Mohamed Mohideedn and another vs. R.V.Sethusubramania Pillai and others AIR 1974 SC 740
Commissioner, HR & CE Board Madras vs. Vinayakar Arudra Tiruppani Sabha
Jagan Singh (Dead) through vs. Dhanwant and another (2012) 2 SCC 628
Assistant Commissioner, HR & CE, Salem and others vs. Nattamai K.S.Ellappa Mudaliar and others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.