SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Mad) 3038

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
T. Krishnavalli, J.
G. Saravanachandran - Appellants
Vs.
R. Jones Anitha Rani - Respondent
C.M.A. (MD) No. 741 of 2018
Decided On : 09-06-2021

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : S. Srinivasa Raghavan for J. Lawrance
For the Respondents: P.T.S. Narendravasan

Headnote:

Indian Divorce Act, - Section 18 r/w 19(4) – Civil Procedure Code.1908 – Section 13 – Appeal For - Decreetal and executable - Order - Petitioner studied B.E. (Mechanical) Decree Course in India and M.S. Course in Germany - When petitioner came to India for vacation during 3rd week of respondent accompanied family members of petitioner to Chennai Airport - Having introduction on respondent and her family members took petitioner to J.C.M. Church District and forced petitioner to put signature in Church records as if marriage was solemnized between respondent and petitioner - In 1st week of petitioner went back to Germany and got a job thereon - Petitioner returned to India in 1st week of and settled in his native place at and looking after business of Match Industries left by his father who died in respondent and her family members got money on several occasions from petitioner by threat and also illegally sequestered petitioner's Passport and Bank ATM. It is alleged that petitioner informed threat and illegal extraction of money by respondent and her family members to his close family friend petitioner and his family friend went to J.C.M. Church and perused Register of Marriage and found that respondent recorded her marital status as 'Widow. respondent had already got married with one and he is a Medical Practitioner in Malaysia. -Whether first marriage of respondent was dissolved as per law and after dissolution of first marriage, respondent married appellant – Held, It is pertinent to note that first marriage between respondent and her first husband was solemnized in India and as per Ex. P10, it was re-registered before Malaysian Government - But no petition for divorce filed in Indian. Further, RW1 stated that she filed HMOP for restitution of conjugal rights against her husband in India and obtained order of conjugal rights and it is still in force - First marriage between respondent and her first husband was still in existence in India - Further respondent obtained an order of conjugal rights against her first husband - It is to be noted here that divorce decree passed by Court of Malaysia is an ex-parte decree and it was not passed on merits - Further marriage between respondent/respondent and her first husband was not solemnized in Malaysia and it was solemnized in India. Hence, the ex-parte decree of divorce passed by the Malaysian Court will not bind respondent - Further respondent herself admitted that against ex-parte decree of divorce passed by Malaysian Court she obtained a decree of restitution of conjugal rights in Indian Court - First marriage between respondent and her first husband is still in subsistence since she obtained restitution of conjugal rights against her first husband - Further petitioner stated that only by threat of family members of respondent he married respondent - For that he gave a complaint to police - But without considering that respondent failed to prove that first marriage between her and her first husband was dissolved in India trial court has erroneously come to conclusion that respondent after dissolution of first marriage she married petitioner - Impugned order passed by trial court is required interference of court - Civil Miscellaneous Appeal allowed.

JUDGMENT :

T. Krishnavalli, J.

1. This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is directed against the decreetal and executable order, dated 05.12.2017 passed in IDOP No. 170 of 2014 on the file of the I Additional District Judge, Tirunelveli.

2. The respondent herein is a Professor working as Head of Department, M.C.A. Department, Meenakshi College of Engineering at Chennai. The respondent had inducted as a tenant in the year 2001 in the residential building, which was purchased by the petitioner's father at Kodambakkam, Chennai. The petitioner studied B.E. (Mechanical) Decree Course in the Academic year 2002-2006 in India and M.S. (Mechatronics) Course in Germany from 2006 to 2009. When the petitioner came to India for vacation during the 3rd week of December 2008, the respondent accompanied the family members of the petitioner to Chennai Airport. Having the introduction, on 22.12.2008 the respondent and her family members took the petitioner to J.C.M. Church Venkateswarapuram, Alangulam Taluk, Tirunelveli District and forced the petitioner to put signature in the Church records as if marriage was solemnized between the respondent and the petitioner. In the 1st week of January 2009, the petitioner went back to Germany and got a job thereon. Thereafter, the petitioner returned to India in the 1st week of June 2009 and settled in his native place at Sivakasi and looking after the business of Match Industries, left by his father, who died in the year 2006. The respondent and her family members got money on several occasions from the petitioner by threat and also illegally sequestered the petitioner's Passport and Bank ATM. It is alleged that the petitioner informed the threat and illegal extraction of money by the respondent and her family members to his close family friend Mr. Dhanabalan. On 18.07.2014, the petitioner and his family friend Dhanabalan went to J.C.M. Church and perused the Register of Marriage and found that the respondent recorded her marital status as 'Widow.' The respondent had already got married with one Dr. Prince David and he is a Medical Practitioner in Malaysia. The petitioner lodged a complaint on 29.07.2014 before the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Alangulam, Tirunelveli District for the illegal act committed by the respondent and her family members. The said complaint was directed to Uthumalai Police Officer and he enquired and advised the petitioner and the respondent to resolve the matter in the Court of Law. Hence, the petitioner filed a petition in IDOP No. 170 of 2014 under section 18 r/w 19(4) of the Indian Divorce Act, declaring the marriage, dated 22.12.2008 between him and the respondent registered as Book No. 1 Sl. No. 47/2008 on the file of the Register of Marriage of J.C.M. Church, Venkateswarapuram, Alangulam, Taluk, Tirunelveli District as null and void. The learned trial Court, by order, dated 05.12.2017, dismissed the petition. Aggrieved over the same, the petitioner is before this court as appellant.

3. The main contention raised on the side of the appellant/petitioner is that the earlier marriage of the respondent/respondent with her previous husband was in subsistence and hence, the marriage between the appellant/petitioner and the respondent/respondent is null and void and prays that the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal has to be allowed.

4. On the other hand, the learned counsel appearing for the respondent/respondent submitted that after dissolution of the first marriage, the respondent/respondent married the appellant/petitioner and hence, the marriage between the appellant/petitioner and the respondent/respondent is valid and prays that the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal has to be dismissed.

5. The appellant/petitioner stated that the earlier marriage of the respondent/respondent with her first husband was in subsistence and due to threat by the family members of the respondent/respondent, the appellant/petitioner married the respondent/respondent and hence, the marriage between the appellant/petitioner

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon Back to top