SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(Mad) 2450

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S. VAIDYANATHAN, J.
Mohana Seshathri S/o. Kumarasamy - Petitioner
Versus
E. Anuja D/o. K.R.A.Elangovan – Respondent
Transfer C.M.P.No.54 of 2020
Decided on : 11-02-2020

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr.A.Mohan

Headnote:

Constitution of India,1950 – Article 226 and 227 – Civil Procedure Code,1908 – Section 24 – Criminal Procedure Code,1973 – Section 125 - Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 – Section 26 - Learned counsel, accepts notice on behalf of Respondent - Also heard, learned counsel, who assisted this Court, as regards issue in question - When this matter is taken up 'for admission', this Court posed a question to learned counsel for Petitioner that, when the proceedings in D.V.C. are pending before Criminal Court, whether Section 24 C.P.C. can be invoked to transfer matter from a Criminal Court to a Civil Court - Learned counsel for the Petitioner submitted that, only Article 227 of Constitution of India can be invoked for transferring a case from a Criminal Court to a Civil Court - Though, Section 26 of the Domestic Violence Act empowers the parties to approach the Family Court, Civil Court or Criminal Court, hurdle is that, no party is empowered to file a case directly before any one of said Forums - Under the Domestic Violence Act, the aggrieved wife has to make a representation to Social Welfare Officer, who, after verification, has to lodge a complaint only before Judicial Magistrate, who takes up the case based on the complaint - Social Welfare Officer cannot directly lodge a complaint before the Family Court or Civil Court - Whether Section 24 C.P.C. can be invoked to transfer matter from a Criminal Court to a Civil Court– Held, A joint trial is ordered when a court finds that the ordering of such a trial, would avoid separate overlapping evidence being taken in the two causes put in suit and it will be more convenient to try them together in interests of parties and in interests of an effective trial of causes - This power inheres in court as an inherent power - It is not possible to accept argument that every time court transfers a suit to another court or orders a joint trial, it has to have consent of the parties - A court has the power in an appropriate case to transfer a suit for being tried with another if circumstances warranted and justified it - However, by invoking Article 227 of the Constitution of India, matter may be transferred from a Criminal Court to a Family Court or any other Court mentioned under 26 of the Domestic Violence Act - In view of this Court, instead of rejecting this Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition, directs the Registry to re-number the same as one under Article 227 of Constitution of India, on receipt of necessary Court fee, and post matter for hearing before Court concerned - Assistance rendered by learned counsel, by producing various judgments relevant to issue in question, is appreciated – Order accordingly.

ORDER :

1. This Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition is filed seeking to transfer the proceedings in D.V.C.No.45 of 2018 pending on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate Court at Tambaram to the file of the Sub Court at Tambaram, and for a direction to the Sub Court at Tambaram to conduct joint trial in H.M.O.P.No.715 of 2017 and D.V.C.No.45 of 2018.

2. Heard Mr.A.Mohan, learned counsel for the Petitioner.

Mr.C.Deivasigamani, learned counsel, accepts notice on behalf of the Respondent. Also heard Mr.N.Manokaran, learned counsel, who assisted this Court, as regards the issue in question.

3. Today, when this matter is taken up 'for admission', this Court posed a question to the learned counsel for the Petitioner that, when the proceedings in D.V.C.No.45 of 2018 are pending before the Criminal Court, whether Section 24 C.P.C. can be invoked to transfer the matter from a Criminal Court to a Civil Court.

4. Learned counsel for the Petitioner submitted that, only Article 227 of the Constitution of India can be invoked for transferring a case from a Criminal Court to a Civil Court.

5. Though, Section 26 of the Domestic Violence Act empowers the parties to approach the Family Court, Civil Court or Criminal Court, the hurdle is that, no party is empowered to file a case directly before any one of the said Forums.

6. Under the Domestic Violence Act, the aggrieved wife has to make a representation to the Social Welfare Officer, who, after verification, has to lodge a complaint only before the Judicial Magistrate, who takes up the case based on the complaint. Hence, the Social Welfare Officer cannot directly lodge a complaint before the Family Court or Civil Court.

7. Section 26 of the Domestic Violence Act empowers that, violence on the part of the husband can be resolved by various other Courts, and that, powers of the Criminal Court in dealing with offences under the Domestic Violence Act, are only civil in nature.

8. Section 125 Cr.P.C. can also be invoked by the wife before the Criminal Court to claim maintenance, which is civil in nature. In this regard, this Court posed a question to the learned counsel for the parties as to whether Section 24 C.P.C. can be invoked to transfer a case from a Criminal Court to a Civil Court or Family Court, even though the dispute is civil in nature.

9. Mr.A.Mohan, learned counsel for the Petitioner, has mainly relied on a Bombay High Court decision in the case of Minoti Subhash Anand vs. Subhash Manoharlal Anand, reported in 2016 (1) AIR Bom.R (Cri) 247, wherein, it is held that the High Court is empowered to transfer any proceedings even pending before Criminal Court which is subordinate to High Court or over which High Court has power of superintendence to another Criminal Court, which is subordinate to High Court or over which High Court has power of superintendence. Relevant portion of the said decision is extracted hereunder:

    “16. A perusal of the Miscellaneous Civil Application filed by the applicant clearly indicates that the applicant has not only invoked the provisions under section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 but has also invoked general and inherent jurisdiction and jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. It is not in dispute between the parties that the reliefs claimed by the applicant before the learned Metropolitan Magistrate under the provisions of Domestic Violence Act can be granted by the Family Court. Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 in my view will have to be read with the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960 and in particular Rule 6 of Chapter I. A conjoint reading of section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 and Rule 6 of Chapter I of the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960 clearly indicates that an application for transfer of suits, appeals, criminal cases or other proceedings pending for trial or disposal in any Civil Court or Criminal Court subordinate to the High Court or over which the High Court has power

                  Click Here to Read the rest of this document
                  1
                  2
                  3
                  4
                  5
                  6
                  7
                  8
                  9
                  10
                  11
                  SupremeToday Portrait Ad
                  supreme today icon
                  logo-black

                  An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

                  Please visit our Training & Support
                  Center or Contact Us for assistance

                  qr

                  Scan Me!

                  India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

                  For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

                  whatsapp-icon Back to top