JUDGMENT :

There are two batches of litigation. They are separately tried. However, given the factual matrix and evidentiary significance that one throws on the others, this Court has chosen to consolidate them for pronouncing judgment.

2. A broad opening statement may be made :

There are three prime characters in this batch of cases: (a) Bolla Arunakumari and another; (b) Sudhakar Reddy; and (c) Pandurangan. Pandurangan’s wife is one Vijayakumari. She has a very minimal role in both the batches of cases.

There are three adjacent plots in a layout viz., Plot No.10, Plot No.11 and Plot No.12. Bolla Aruna Kumari claims title to Plot No:10, Vijaykumari is the owner of Plot No:11 and Sudhakar Reddy asserts title over Plot No:12.

The broad allegations of the title holders of Plot No.10 & Plot No.12 are that Pandurangan, the occupant of Plot No.11, which is a middle plot of the three, has forcibly occupied the two adjacent plots - Plot Nos.10 & 12.

Initially Bolla Aruna Kumari, and Sudhakar Reddy had come up with independent suits, for bare injunction against Vijayakumari and Pandurangan,