SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Mad) 3363

R.SUBRAMANIAN
M. Thangamani – Appellant
Versus
V. Sellamuthu – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr.A.Sivaji
For the Respondents: Mr.N.Manokaran for R1 to R3 /

JUDGMENT :

This civil miscellaneous second appeal is directed against the order confirming the judgment of the Additional district Judge, Namakkal in CMA.No.13 of 2020, the appeal against the order of the Sub-Court, Sankari made in EP.No.32 of 2009 dated 06.01.2020.

2. The proceedings arose out of a suit for specific performance laid by the respondents 1 to 3 herein, against one M/s. T.L.Manickam and N.Natarajan. The suit came to be decreed by the Sub-Court, Sankari on 27.02.2001. An appeal was filed against the said judgment and decree in AS.No.58 of 2002 before this Court, which came to be dismissed on 24.03.2009. The Appellant herein, who was impleaded as the legal representative of the deceased 1st defendant in the suit along with the other defendants challenged the correctness of the judgment of this Court in CA.No.4264 of 2010 before the Hon'ble Supreme Court. The said Civil Appeal also came to be dismissed on 16.11.2016. Thereafter, the decree was put in execution.

3. Before the Executing Court, the appelalant herein, filed an application in EA.No.236 of 2017 purportedly under Order 21 Rule 58 projecting an independent claim over the property. The said execution application ca

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top