G.CHANDRASEKHARAN
M. Shanthi – Appellant
Versus
M. Poornima – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
This second appeal is filed challenging the judgment of II Additional District Judge, Vellore at Ranipet in A.S.No.46/2017 reversing the judgment of the trial Court in O.S.No.73/2015 on the file of Subordinate Judge, Arakkonam.
2. The respondents filed the suit claiming a sum of Rs.6,08,133/- with future interest on Rs.2 lakhs at the rate of 24% per annum from the date of suit till the date of preliminary decree and thereafter, at the rate of 6% per annum till the date of realisation on the basis of a mortgage, and on default to make payment, the sale of mortgaged property with liberty to proceed against the defendants under Order 34 Rule 6 for the deficiency, if any, and for costs.
3. The case of the respondents is that the first respondent is the wife and respondents 2 and 3 are the daughters of one R.Venkatesh Rao. The first appellant is the wife of late G.Mohan and other appellants are his children. For a full and valid consideration received from Venkatesh Rao, Mohan and first appellant jointly executed a registered mortgage deed on 23.11.2005 for Rs.2 lakhs. They promised to pay interest at 24% per annum. Mohan paid interest up to December' 2006. Thereafter, Mohan and
State of Rajasthan Vs. T.N. Sahani and Others
T.Tamilarasan Vs. Arokkiasamy and others
Land Acquisition Officer, City Improvement Trust Board vs. H.Narayanaiah & Ors.
Shalimar Chemical Works Ltd.,vs. Surendra Oil & Dal Mills (Refineries) & 7 Ors.
K.M. Thangavel and others vs. K.T. Udayakumar and another
Akula Rangappa v. Narayana Swamy
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.