IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
A.D. JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J.
Periyasamy – Appellant
Versus
State Rep. by the Assistant Commissioner of Police, Salem – Respondent
Criminal Appeal No. 542 of 2019
Decided On : 10-12-2021
SC and ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 - Section 3(1)(x) - Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Harassment of Women Act, 1998 - Section 4 – Indian Penal Code,1860 - Section 417 - Terminated Pregnancy - On birth day of de facto complainant they went to Temple and when de facto complainant was worshipping appellant had tied mangal sutra to her and on same day he had forcible sexual intercourse with her at her grandmother's house and thereafter appellant had sexual intercourse with her on several occasion resultantly de facto complainant was pregnant in year however it was aborted - Later appellant had gone to Chennai on getting a job after completing course however they met once in fortnight and had sexual intercourse on those occasions as a result she was once again pregnant in year and same was also medically terminated and likewise she got pregnant thrice and terminated her pregnancy at instance and instigation of appellant - Held, So far as offence punishable Section 3(1)(x) of SC&ST (POA) Act, 1989 is concerned this court finds that case of prosecution is that de facto complainant was insulted by calling her caste name in a public bus while they were returning from when she demanded him to marry her - Of course calling a person by his caste name in public with an intention to humiliate him is certainly an offence punishable Section 3(1)(x) of SC&ST (POA) Act, 1989 but as held in decision in a case it should be seen as to whether there was any intent to insult or humiliate the de facto complainant by using caste name as it depends on context in which it was used - Even as per case of prosecution it was uttered by appellant as a reason for his inability to marry her - Further place where appellant is said to have uttered such a word is a public bus which could certainly have some public apart from de facto complainant and appellant and even if there was no other public driver and conductor of bus could be there and if at all appellant had uttered caste name to humiliate de facto complainant - Criminal Appeal stands Allowed.
JUDGMENT :
A.D. JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J.
1. The Criminal Appeal has been filed against the judgment of conviction and sentence dated 30.7.2019 passed by the Special Judge/Principal District and Sessions Judge, Salem in S.C. No. 306 of 2015.
2. By the judgment of the Trial Court, the appellant stands convicted and sentenced as under:
| Provision of conviction | Sentence |
| Section 417 IPC | R.I. for one year with fine of Rs. 1000/- in default, R.I. for four months. |
| Section 3(1)(x) of SC and ST (POA) Act, 1989 | R.I. for one year with fine of Rs. 1000/- in default, R.I. for four months |
The substantive sentences awarded was directed to be run concurrently.
3. Brief facts of the case evinced from the complaint and the version of the prosecution witnesses are as under:
(ii) On 21.3.2010, on the birth day of the de facto complainant, they went to the Kailasanathar Temple, Dharamangalam and when the de facto complainant was worshipping, the appellant had tied mangal sutra to her and on the same day, he had forcible sexual intercourse with her at her grandmother's house and thereafter, the appellant had sexual intercourse with her on several occasion resultantly, the de facto complainant was pregnant in the year 2010, however, it was aborted.
(iii) Later, the appellant had gone to Chennai on getting a job, after completing the course, however, they met once in fortnight and had sexual intercourse on those occasions, as a result, she was once again pregnant in the year 2014 and the same was also medically terminated and likewise, she got pregnant thrice and terminated her pregnancy at the instance and instigation of the appellant.
(iv) However, when the de facto complainant had demanded the appellant to marry her, the appellant had evaded the same initially by taking some vague reasons like his father's illness, his mother's dislike, etc., ultimately, he had bluntly refused on the ground that she belongs to a community which does not suit for their family and hence, she had lodged the complaint, Ex.P1 dated 11.6.2015.
(v) PW-19, Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Salem, on receipt of the complaint, Ex.P1, registered a case in Crime No. 11 of 2015 against the appellant for the offence punishable under Section 417 IPC, Section 4 of Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Harassment of Women Act, 1998 and Section 3(1)(x) of SC and ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 and the FIR is EX.P13. PW-19 had sent the original FIR and the complaint to the Mahila Court and copies to her higher officials.
(vi) Subsequently, as per the proceedings of the Superintendent of Police in Ex.P19, PW-20, the then Assistant Commissioner of Police, South Range (L&O), Salem took up the investigation. He proceeded to the scene of occurrence on 11.6.2015 at 5.30 p.m. and prepared observation mahazar, Ex.P6 and rough sketch, Ex.P14 in the presence of PW-7 Srinivasan and one Thangaraj. Thereafter, he had enquired PWs. 1, 5 and 6 and recorded their statements.
(vii) On 12.6.2015, having received information, PW-20 had arrested the accused at Salem Old Bus Stand in the presence of PW-15 Sekar, Village Administrative Officer and his Assistant Ravi. Thereafter, PW-20 had enquired the witnesses and recorded their statements and after recording the voluntary confession statement of the accused, remanded him to judicial custody. Thereafter, he had issued requisition to the Tahsildar for issuance of community certificate of the accused and the de facto complainant. The community certificate of the de facto complainant is Ex.P11 and that of the accused is Ex.P12. On 13.6.2015, he had enquired the witnesses, PW-8
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.