SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Mad) 481

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
G.R. SWAMINATHAN, J.
S. Sarath Kumar – Petitioner
Versus
The District Collector, Virudhunagar & Ors. – Respondents
W.P.(MD) No. 13304 of 2022
Decided On : 30-06-2022

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:R. Murugan, Advocate.
For the Respondent: R1, K. Balasubramani, Special Government Pleader, R2, K.S. Selva Ganesan, Additional Government Pleader.

Point of Law
Special Marriage Act - Registration of Marriage – Marriage not registered under Special Marriage Act, 1954 - He cannot avail the benefit set out in Section 4 of the Act - Notice under S. 5 of Act held valid for 3 months.

Headnote:

Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 226 - Special Marriage Act, 1954 - Section 5, 4, 4 (c), 8, 9, 10, 12, 13, 15 - Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Section 7-A - Indian Christian Marriage Act, 1872 - Special Marriage Act, 1954 – Registration of Marriage - Place and form of solemnization - Registration of marriages celebrated in other forms - Procedure on receipt of objection - Petitioner belongs to a Scheduled Caste - He fell in love who professes Christianity - Their relationship was approved by both the families - They purportedly got married in the presence of local panchayat president and a political functionary - Couple thereafter submitted a joint application before second respondent - Whether direction can be issued - Sacramental marriage performed as per ceremonies as well as a marriage celebrated in terms of Section 7-A are both valid - However, Suyamariyathai and Seerthiruththa marriages (reformist/self respect marriages) can be performed only between two Hindus. (Para 6 & 8)

Findings of the Court :

Section 10 of Act states that every marriage shall be solemnized - Section 11 of Act stipulates that venue of marriage must be invariably a church - It is not case of petitioner that his marriage was solemnized under Indian Christian Marriage Act, 1872 - Petitioner can hope to succeed only if he can show that his marriage was solemnized under Special Marriage Act - Even according to petitioner, marriage was performed - Only thereafter, notice was given under Section 5 of Act - Giving notice under Section 5 is first step - Petitioner and his wife have been quite fast so far - But law does not always believe in speed - Things have to move only in a sequential order - couple in question have put cart before horse - parties after performing their so-called marriage had given notice under Section 5 of Act - language of Section 5 of Act is clear - Petitioner did not marry under Special Marriage Act, 1954 - He cannot avail benefit set out in Section 4 of Act - second respondent rightly declined petitioner's request - No mandamus can be issued contrary to law.

Result : Writ petition dismissed.

JUDGMENT

(Prayer: Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the 2nd respondent to register the petitioner's marriage held between the petitioner and his wife Lediya with the consent of both the families at my residence on 10.06.2022, based on the application dated 15.06.2022.)

1. Is age a mere number ?. Not always. That is what the writ petitioner learnt to his utter dismay.

2. The petitioner belongs to a Scheduled Caste. He fell in love with Ms. Lediya who professes Christianity. Their relationship was approved by both the families. They purportedly got married on 10.06.2022 in the presence of the local panchayat president and a political functionary. The couple thereafter submitted a joint application before the second respondent on 17.06.2022. What was submitted was only a notice under Section 5 of The Special Marriage Act, 1954. The couple were under the fond hope that they will be issued with a marriage certificate. Though the parents of the couple had given green signal, the registering authority waved the red flag. He told them that registration was not possible because Ms. Lediya was yet to turn 21. That led to the filing of this writ petition.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the writ petitioner submitted that the second respondent failed to take note of Section 4 (c) of the Act, as per which it would be enough if the female had completed the age of 18 years. He called upon this Court to issue a direction for registering the marriage.

4. The moot question is whether such a direction can be issued. The Act makes a distinction regarding the modes of solemnizing a marriage. Marriage can be solemnized under the Act itself or it can be celebrated in other forms. Chapter II of the Act deals with solemnization of special marriages. Section 4 sets out the conditions therefor. Section 5 stipulates that the parties to the marriage should give notice thereof in the prescribed form. The marriage officer shall enter the notices given thereunder in the Marriage Notice Book and it shall be open for inspection. That is how the news about the proposed marriage between 70 year old Periyar E.V. Ramasamy and 32 year old Maniyammai, became known because someone came across the notice of intended marriage given by them. French President Emmanuel Macron's wife is 25 years older to him. For such illustrious couples, age is a mere number.

5. Let us come back to the statutory scheme. Any person can lodge objection to the marriage within thirty days if the conditions specified in Section 4 have been contravened. Section 8 to 10 deal with the procedure on receipt of objection. Section 12 and 13 are as follows:

    “12. Place and form of solemnization.

(1) The marriage may be solemnized at the office of the Marriage Officer, or at such other place within a reasonable distance therefrom as the parties may desire, and upon such conditions and the payment of such additional fees as may be prescribed.

(2) The marriage may be solemnized in any form which the parties may choose to adopt: Provided that it shall not be complete and binding on the parties unless each party says to the other in the presence of the Marriage Officer and the three witnesses and in any language understood by the parties,-- "I, (A), take the (B), to be my lawful wife (or husband)".

“13. Certificate of marriage.-(1) When the marriage has been solemnized, the Marriage Officer shall enter a certificate thereof in the form specified in the Fourth Schedule in a book to be kept by him for that purpose and to be called the Marriage Certificate Book and such certificate shall be signed by the parties to the marriage and the three witnesses. (2) On a certificate being entered in the Marriage Certificate Book by the Marriage Officer, the Certificate shall be deemed to be conclusive evidence of the fact that a marriage under this Act has been solemnized and that all formalities respecting the signatures of witnesses have been complied

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top