SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Mad) 567

V. M. VELUMANI, S. SOUNTHAR
C. Sivakumar – Appellant
Versus
A. Srividhya – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :S. Subbiah, Senior Counsel, M/s. P. Raja, Advocate.
For the Respondent:S. Vijayaraghavan, Advocate.

Judgement Key Points

Key Points: - The court discusses cruelty under Hindu Marriage Act 13(1)(ia) and its mental cruelty interpretation using Apex Court precedents (!) (!) (!) . - Fact pattern: wife's suspicions, false complaints, and creating scenes at the husband’s workplace amount to mental cruelty per the judgment (!) (!) (!) (!) . - Evidence cited includes acts like visiting workplace, making complaints to police, and allegations of illicit relationships, leading to inference of mental cruelty (!) (!) (!) (!) . - The Family Court dismissed the petition; the High Court allowed the appeal and granted a decree for divorce in favor of the husband (!) (!) . - References to related precedents cited to define cruelty and its mental aspect (A. Jayachandra v. Annel kaur, K. Srinivas Rao v. D.A. Deepa, Narendra v. K. Meena, etc.) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) . - Removal of thali chain at separation considered as evidence of intent to dissolve the marriage and mental cruelty in this case (!) (!) . - Final order: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal allowed; decree for divorce granted to husband; no cost order (!) .

What is the standard of mental cruelty under the Hindu Marriage Act as applied to divorce?

What are the factual acts that the court considered as mental cruelty grounds for divorce?

What is the outcome of the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal regarding the divorce petition on grounds of cruelty?


JUDGMENT :

S. Sounthar, J.

(Prayer: This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 19 of the Family Court Act, to set aside the decree and the judgment dated 15.06.2016 rendered in H.M.O.P.No.604 of 2014, on the file of the Family Court at Erode, by allowing this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal.)

1. Aggrieved by an order dismissing the petition for divorce filed on the ground of cruelty by appellant/husband the present appeal is filed.

2. The appellant/husband sought for divorce on the ground of cruelty in H.M.O.P.No.604 of 2014, on the file of the Family Court, Erode. According to him the marriage with the respondent took place on 10.11.2008. At the time of marriage he was working as a Lecturer in Vivekanandha Medical College and the respondent/wife was working as a Teacher in Government School. They lived together for 2 and 1/2 years in the parental home of the appellant and out of wedlock a female child Sreedhanya was born. According to appellant, the respondent/wife developed suspicion about the appellant's conduct and character and humiliated him by connecting him with his female colleagues. A false complaint was preferred by respondent/wife against appellant/husband before Thi

                  Click Here to Read the rest of this document
                  1
                  2
                  3
                  4
                  5
                  6
                  7
                  8
                  9
                  10
                  11
                  SupremeToday Portrait Ad
                  supreme today icon
                  logo-black

                  An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

                  Please visit our Training & Support
                  Center or Contact Us for assistance

                  qr

                  Scan Me!

                  India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

                  For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

                  whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
                  whatsapp-icon Back to top