SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Mad) 5

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.
Saraswathi – Appellant
Versus
Sellammal - Respondents
CRP No.2057 of 2022
Decided on : 03-01-2023

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr.K.Rajasekaran

The Court considered the exceptional circumstances of the pandemic and the delay in payment, leading to the setting aside of the Docket Order and granting permission to pay the cost amount within a specified time frame.

Headnote:

CIVIL REVISION PETITION - Interlocutory Application - Court considered delay in payment due to pandemic and set aside the order, permitting the petitioner to pay the cost amount within a specified time frame.

Fact of the Case:

The revision petitioner, the third defendant in a specific performance suit, was set ex parte and filed an Interlocutory Application challenging the ex parte order. The High Court had directed the petitioner to pay a sum of Rs.50,000 within two weeks, but due to the pandemic, there was a delay in depositing the amount. The Trial Court returned the papers along with the Bank Demand Draft, leading to the present Civil Revision Petition.

Finding of the Court:

The Court considered the pandemic duration and the delay in paying the cost amount, setting aside the Docket Order and permitting the petitioner to pay the cost amount within a specified time frame.

Issues: Delay in payment of cost amount ordered by the High Court, consideration of pandemic duration, and Trial Court's refusal to accept the Bank Demand Draft.

Ratio Decidendi: The Court considered the exceptional circumstances of the pandemic and the delay in payment, leading to the setting aside of the Docket Order and granting permission to pay the cost amount within a specified time frame.

Final Decision: The Docket Order dated 14.02.2022 in Unnumbered Interlocutory Application of 2022 in OS No.253 of 2010 is set aside, and the petitioner is permitted to pay the cost amount of Rs.50,000 on or before 20.01.2023, failing which the present Civil Revision Petition shall stand dismissed automatically.

ORDER :

PRAYER : This Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the Docket Order dated 14.02.2022 in Unnumbered Interlocutory Application of 2022 in OS No.253 of 2010 on the file of the learned Subordinate Judge, Thiruchengode.

The present Civil Revision Petition is filed against the Docket Order dated 14.02.2022 in Unnumbered Interlocutory Application of 2022 in OS No.253 of 2010 on the file of the learned Subordinate Judge, Thiruchengode.

2. The revision petitioner is the third defendant in the suit instituted by the third respondent for specific performance.

3. As far as OS No.253 of 2010 is concerned, the revision petitioner has been set ex parte and challenging that said ex parte order, an Interlocutory Application was filed. Thereafter CRP No.3996 of 2017 was filed before the High Court and this Court passed an order on 09.03.2020, directing the petitioner to pay a sum of Rs.50,000/- to Mr.Palanisamy, who is the respondent in CRP, within a period of two weeks. The Trial Court received the copy of the order dated 21.09.2020.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner made a submission that since it was a Pandemic duration, the petitioner was not in a position to immediately deposit the said amount of Rs.50,000/- before the Trial Court. However, on receipt of the certified copy of the order, the revision petitioner filed an application along with the Bank Demand Draft for Rs.50,000/-.

5. The Trial Court without considering the Pandemic duration returned the papers along with the Bank Demand Draft. Thus, the petitioner is constrained to move the present Civil Revision Petition.

6. No doubt, there was delay in paying the cost amount of Rs.50,000/- as ordered by the High Court in CRP No.3996 f 2017.

7. Considering the fact that the certified copy of the order was received by the Trial Court on 21.09.2020 during the mid Pandemic duration, this Court is inclined to consider the present Civil Revision Petition.

8. Accordingly, the Docket Order dated 14.02.2022 in Unnumbered Interlocutory Application of 2022 in OS No.253 of 2010 on the file of the learned Subordinate Judge, Thiruchengode is set aside and the petitioner is permitted to pay the cost amount of Rs.50,000/- on or before 20.01.2023, failing which the present Civil Revision Petition shall stand dismissed automatically. The Trial Court may accept the Web copy if produced by the petitioner for the purpose of accepting the Demand Draft. However, there shall be no order as to costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top