Back
S. M. SUBRAMANIAM
P. Janakiraman – Appellant
Versus
Managing Director, Chennai Metropolitan Water Supply and Sewerage Board – Respondent
ORDER :
1. The order of rejection rejecting the claim of the writ petitioner for appointment on compassionate ground, is under challenge in the present writ petition.
2. Perusal of the order impugned reveals that the application submitted by the mother of the writ petitioner was rejected and the writ petitioner submitted an application in the year 2016, after attaining the age of majority.
3. The petitioner states that his father late Mr.M.Pachaippan was employed in Chennai Metropolitan Water Supply and Sewerage Board on 05.11.2007, while he was in service. Admittedly, at the time of death of his father, the petitioner was a minor and therefore, he was not eligible for appointment on compassionate ground.
4. The mother of the writ petitioner submitted an application, seeking an appointment on compassionate ground on 23.07.2009 and the said application was not considered by the Competent Authorities. Since the mother was aged, thereafter, she has filed another application in the year 2016 to provide appointment for her son, who is the petitioner herein. The Authorities have rejected the application of the writ petitioner on the ground that second application for compassionate appointme
Compassionate appointment is an exception to the general rule and must be subject to strict scrutiny of various parameters, including the financial position of the family and the economic dependence ....
Compassionate appointment is a concession and not a right, and should be strictly implemented in accordance with the prevailing rules and parameters.
Compassionate appointment is a concession, not an absolute right, and should be granted strictly in accordance with the terms and conditions, without diluting the eligibility criteria.
Compassionate appointment is not a right and can only be granted under exceptional circumstances, as per the legal provisions and principles discussed by the court.
Compassionate appointment is a concession and not a right, and it is to be provided strictly in accordance with the terms and conditions stipulated. Lapse of time can be a ground to deny appointment ....
Compassionate appointments must adhere to strict timelines and cannot be claimed as a right, emphasizing the need for timely applications to address immediate financial crises.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the need for strict adherence to the terms and conditions of compassionate appointment, the consideration of indigent circumstances, and the verifi....
Compassionate appointment is an exception to the general rule and must be made in accordance with the state's policy and eligibility criteria, considering the financial condition of the deceased empl....
Compassionate appointment is a concession and not a right, and must be strictly implemented in accordance with the terms and conditions stipulated. It is an exception to the general rule of appointme....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
