SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Mad) 898

S. M. SUBRAMANIAM
T. Ezhil – Appellant
Versus
E. Sivakumar – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: E. Kandhan.

ORDER :

1. The Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition is filed to withdraw the case in HMOP No. 60 of 2021 from the file of the Sub Court at Ulundurpet and transfer the same to the file of the Family Court at Chennai.

2. The marriage between the petitioner and the respondent was solemnised on 01.05.2015 as per Hindu Rites and Customs. Due to misunderstanding, both the petitioner and the respondent are living separately. A female child was born from and out of the wedlock and is aged about 5 years old.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner and the female child now aged about 5 years old are living with her parents. The petitioner is working as Typist at Chennai on temporary basis. She has to take care of her 5 years old female child. Thus she is not in a position to travel all along from Chennai to Ulundurpet and contest the HMOP No. 60 of 2021 filed by the respondent for dissolution of marriage before the Sub Court at Ulundurpet.

4. The principles regarding transfer petitions, more specifically in the matters of matrimonial cases, are well settled through the three decisions of the High Court of Madras, in the following cases:

    (i) The Hon'ble Division Bench

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top