SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Mad) 895

V. BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN
S. Nirmala – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner, Madurai Corporation – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr.B.Sukumar
For the Respondent: Mr.S.Vinayak Standing Counsel

ORDER :

The Petitioner has prayed for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to give permission to demolish the property situated in Resurvey No.63/6A and 63/6B eastern portion of Plot No.9 in Managiri Second Bit Village, Madurai North Taluk along with building within the time stipulated, on the basis of the Petitioner’s representation, dated 6.8.2022.

2. Mr.S.Vinayak, learned Standing Counsel takes notice for the respondents 1 and 2/Madurai Corporation. By consent of both parties, the Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself.

3. The case of the Petitioner is that the Petitioner had purchased the prayer mentioned property and got it registered in Doc.No.4299/2021, on the file of Sub-Registrar Office, Tallakulam. After purchase, the Petitioner has paid taxes to Madurai Corporation in Assessment Nos. 115/031/00931, 115/031/00932 bearing Door Nos.150 and 151 respectively in Vivekananthar Street and the rain water come to the house and caused damage to the building causing problem to the neighbour and public people. In this regard, the Petitioner sent a representation on 6.8.2022 seeking permission to demolish the building and the same w

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top