IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADRAS, (MADURAI BENCH)
V. Bhavani Subbaroyan, J.
K. Prasanth - Petitioner
Versus
The Regional Passport Officer, Office of the Regional Passport Office, Bharathi Ula Veethi Madurai – 625002 & Anr. – Respondents
W.P.(M.D.)No.22387 of 2022 and W.M.P.(M.D.)Nos.16562 and 16564 of 2022
Decided On : 15-11-2022
Passport - Criminal Cases - Passports Act, 1967, Section 5(2), Section 6(2) - The court discussed the legal provisions of the Passports Act, 1967, specifically Section 5(2) and Section 6(2), and their interpretations in the context of pending criminal cases and issuance of passports. The court highlighted the grounds on which the passport authority can refuse to issue a passport and the conditions under which a passport or travel document could be issued, as per the Notification dated 25.08.1993.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner sought a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to quash a clarification and direct the issuance of a passport, citing pending criminal cases and the need to work abroad.
Finding of the Court:
The court considered the legal provisions of the Passports Act, 1967 and previous cases, and directed the petitioner to seek permission from the concerned Court for issuance or renewal of the passport, emphasizing the need to participate in the criminal proceedings.
Issues: Pending criminal cases affecting passport issuance, interpretation of Passports Act, 1967.
Ratio Decidendi: Passport issuance or renewal is contingent upon production of orders from the concerned Court permitting the applicant to depart from India, and the petitioner must participate in the criminal proceedings.
Final Decision: The Writ Petition was disposed of with directions for the petitioner to seek permission from the concerned Court for passport issuance or renewal, and to participate in the criminal proceedings.
ORDER :
[Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the impugned clarification under Letter Ref.No.SCN/313006633/22, dated 20.07.2022 and to quash the same as unwarranted and unlawful and further to direct the first respondent herein to issue passport under File No.MD1064327265122 to the Petitioner herein within the time frame fixed by this Court.]
1. This Writ Petition is filed seeking issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the impugned clarification under Letter Ref.No.SCN/313006633/22, dated 20.07.2022 and to quash the same as unwarranted and unlawful and further to direct the first respondent herein to issue passport under File No.MD1064327265122 to the Petitioner herein within the time frame fixed by this Court.
2. Heard the learned counsel appearing on either side and perused the materials placed before this Court.
3. The case of the Petitioner is that the Petitioner is the second son to my age old parents and has a fair chance of getting a job in abroad. The Petitioner came to know that the Petitioner has been falsely implicated in a criminal case in Crime No.298 of 2012 on the file of the second respondent for the offence under Section 454 and 380 of the Indian Penal Code. This was known to the Petitioner from the order impugned herein. Further there is also another criminal case against the Petitioner in Crime No.35 of 2022 for the offence under Section 341, 294(b), 323,324 and 506(ii) of IPC and Section 4 of TNPWH Act. In the meant i.e. the Petitioner applied for passport under File No. MD1064327265122. On police verification the passport authorites came to know about the above said two criminal cases pending against the Petitioner and hence passed the order impugned herein. Since the Petitioner’s request for passport was considered, the Petitioner has come forward with the present Writ Petition for the relief stated supra.
4. The learned Assistant Solicitor General of India and the learned Government Advocate(Crl.Side) appearing for the respondents 1 and 2 respectively, submitted that a case in C.C.No.413 of 2022 has been pending before the jurisdictional Magistrate and prayed for dismissal of this Writ Petition.
5. This Court had an occasion to deal with a similar issue in W.P.(MD) No.7056 of 2017 in the case of N.Chandrababu vs. the Sub Inspector of Police and another. The relevant portions in the order dated 21.04.2017 are extracted hereunder:
Section 5(2) of the Passports Act, 1967
On receipt of an application under this section, the passport authority, after making such inquiry, if any, as it may consider necessary, shall, subject to the other provisions of this Act, by order in writing,-
(a) issue the passport or travel document with endorsement, or, as the case may be, make on the passport or travel document the endorsement, in respect of the foreign countries specified in the application; or
(b) issue the passport or travel document with endorsement, or, as the case may be, make on the passport or travel document the endorsement, in respect of one or more of the foreign countries specified in the application and refuse to make an endorsement in respect of the other country or countries ; or
(c) refuse to issue the passport or travel document or, as the case may be, refuse to make on the passport or travel document any endorsement. Section 6(2) of the Passports Act, 1967.
Subject to the other provisions of this Act, the passport authority shall refuse to issue a passport or travel document for visiting any foreign country under clause (c) of sub-section (2) of section 5 on any one or more of the following grounds,
N. Chandrababu vs. Sub Inspector of Police Palakkarai Police Station, Trichy
Passport issuance or renewal is subject to the production of orders from the concerned Court permitting the applicant to depart from India, and participation in the criminal proceedings is essential.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the issuance or renewal of a passport when a criminal case is pending is subject to the production of orders from the concerned Court permitti....
Passport issuance or renewal is contingent upon production of orders from the concerned Court permitting the applicant to depart from India when a criminal case is pending before a Court.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that a passport can be issued or renewed in the context of a pending criminal case only on the basis of production of orders from the concerned Cou....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the issuance or renewal of a passport in the context of pending criminal proceedings is subject to the requirement of orders from the concerne....
An applicant with a pending criminal case must secure prior permission from the jurisdictional trial court to obtain a passport, in compliance with the requirements of the Passports Act, 1967.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.