IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
A.D. JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J.
Mala Agarwal & Another - Appellant
Versus
Rajiv Agarwal - Respondent
Crl.O.P. No. 4446 of 2022 & Crl.M.P. No. 2255 of 2022
Decided On : 01-03-2022
Cross Examination - Transfer of Criminal Case - The court directed the learned Judicial Magistrate to give the petitioners an opportunity to cross-examine the complainant/PW1 either on the next hearing date or any subsequent date fixed by the Trial Judge.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioners, accused in a criminal case, sought to transfer the case to another Judicial Magistrate after facing difficulties in attending court hearings due to pandemic restrictions and miscommunication with their counsel. The Trial Judge had issued a Non Bailable Warrant of arrest when the petitioners and their counsel failed to appear in court, leading to their remand in judicial custody.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the petitioners should be afforded the opportunity of fair trial and directed the Trial Judge to allow the petitioners to cross-examine the complainant/PW1.
Issues: The main issue was whether the petitioners should be granted the opportunity to cross-examine the complainant/PW1, considering the difficulties they faced in attending court hearings.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that if the petitioners were not permitted to cross-examine PW1, it would amount to a case of no defence, and therefore, they should be given the opportunity to do so.
Final Decision: The Criminal Original Petition was disposed with a direction to the learned Judicial Magistrate to give the petitioners an opportunity to cross-examine the complainant/PW1 either on the next hearing date or any subsequent date fixed by the Trial Judge. It was also made clear that if the petitioners do not cross-examine the complainant/PW1 on the date fixed by the Trial Judge, they shall lose further chance of cross-examining the witnesses.
JUDGMENT
(Prayer: This Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 407 Cr.P.C., to transfer C.C.No.558 of 2017 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Alandur to any other Judicial Magistrate and dispose the same in accordance with law.)
1. This Criminal Original Petition has been filed, to transfer C.C.No.558 of 2017 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Alandur to any other Judicial Magistrate and dispose the same in accordance with law.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners are accused facing Trial in C.C.No.558 of 2017, which is a private complaint filed by the respondent for the offence under Section 109,120 A, 199, 415, 420, 494, 495 and Section 496 of IPC. The petitioners are residing at Thane, Maharashtra. The petitioners had filed applications under Section 311 of Cr.P.C to recall the complainant/PW1 and the Trial Court allowed the petitions on 06.12.2021. The case was posted for cross examination of PW1 on 20.12.2021 and specific time was fixed at 3.00 pm. Due to pandemic restrictions, the petitioners were unable to travel to chennai and due to some miscommunication, the petitioners were unable to contact their counsel. The counsel for the petitioners and the petitioners did not appear before the Court on 20.12.2021 and that the learned Judge irate by the absence of the petitioners and their counsels, had posted the case immediately on the very next day i.e., on 21.12.2021. The petitioners were unable to make travel arrangements within a day and the Trial Court on the very next day, called the petitioners absent and issued Non Bailable Warrant of arrest and posted the case for the purpose of questioning under Section 313 of Cr.P.C on 06.01.2022.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners would further submit that on 06.01.2022, the petitioners were present before the Trial Court and they were ready to surrender themselves before the said Court and recall the Non Bailable Warrant. The learned Trial Judge posted the case to the very next day on 07.01.2022 and on the very next day, the petitioners surrendered before the Court and filed the applications for recalling the warrant. However, learned Trial Judge had dismissed the petition for recalling the warrant and remanded the petitioners to Judicial Custody till 12.01.2022. The petitioners filed the application for bail and the bail application was taken up for hearing, late in the evening on 12.01.2022 and it was dismissed. Later, they were granted bail by the Sessions Court.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that though the petition has been filed seeking for transfer, the petitioners are not insisting for transfer and he would pray that permission may be granted to the petitioners to recall and cross examine PW1. He would further submit that if the petitioners are not allowed to recall and cross examine PW1, it would only amount to a case of no defence. The petitioners should be afforded opportunity of fair trial. The learned counsel would further reiterate that though there had been some lapses on the part of the petitioners, it is on account of the fact that the petitioners are from Maharashtra and they were not properly advised. He would submit that if opportunity is given to th petitioners, they would cross examine PW1 either on the next hearing date or any other date fixed by the Trial Court. Thereby, he would pray for direction to the Trial Judge to recall the complainant/PW1 for cross examination.
5. Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record.
6. The petitioners are accused facing Trial in C.C.No.558 of 2017 on the file learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Alandur. They are residents of Bombay. They have filed applications under Section 311 of Cr.P.C seeking to recall PW1 and the learned Trial Judge by order dated 06.12.2021, had allowed the petitions specifically, fixed the date to cross examine PW1 on 20.12.2021 at 3.00p.m. It is submitted that due to pandemic restri
The main legal principle established in the judgment is the right of the accused to a fair trial, including the opportunity to cross-examine witnesses, even in the face of difficulties in attending c....
The importance of affording the accused an opportunity to examine their witnesses before pronouncing judgment, and the discretion granted to the trial judge in conducting the examination of witnesses....
The right to cross-examine witnesses is fundamental to ensuring a fair trial in criminal proceedings.
The court balanced the rights of both sides and considered the petitioner's undertaking in allowing the recall of witnesses, setting a precedent for imposing conditions for such recalls.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.