Back
V. PARTHIBAN
S. Nirmala – Appellant
Versus
P. Saraswathi – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. parties bound by family arrangement. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. details of family lineage and earlier litigations. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. immediate provocation for filing the suit. (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. kudumba yerpadu's binding nature. (Para 13) |
| 5. defendant's arguments regarding registration requirements. (Para 14 , 15) |
| 6. legal arguments against the suit's maintainability. (Para 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 7. limitations on claims of a family arrangement. (Para 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 8. court's analysis on legitimacy of claims. (Para 23 , 24 , 25) |
| 9. estoppel and principles governing family arrangements. (Para 26 , 27 , 28) |
| 10. court's reliance on previous judgments for ruling. (Para 29 , 30 , 31 , 32) |
| 11. court's final consideration on the suit. (Para 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38) |
| 12. summary and conclusion of the order. (Para 39 , 40 , 41 , 42) |
JUDGMENT
(Prayer: a) For declaration that the plaintiffs and the defendants are bound by “Kudumba Yerpadu” viz., Family Arrangement dated 22.10.1982 executed by Late E.K.Pattabirama Reddiar and others;
b) For permanent injunction restraining the defendants, their men, agents, servants or any other persons claiming through them from in any manner interf
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
