SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Mad) 1151

V. PARTHIBAN
S. Nirmala – Appellant
Versus
P. Saraswathi – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Parties:R. Thiagarajan, P.J. Rishikesh, C. Jagadish, K.V. Ananthakrushnan, Advocates.

JUDGMENT

(Prayer: a) For declaration that the plaintiffs and the defendants are bound by “Kudumba Yerpadu” viz., Family Arrangement dated 22.10.1982 executed by Late E.K.Pattabirama Reddiar and others;

b) For permanent injunction restraining the defendants, their men, agents, servants or any other persons claiming through them from in any manner interfering with the plaintiffs’ right or entitlement to own, possess and enjoy the properties, more fully described in the schedule IV; more fully described in plaint schedule hereunder;

c) For partition and separate possession of the properties more fully described in Schedule III into 5 equal shares and allot 1/5th share to each of the plaintiff 1 and 4 and to the persons entitled to it in accordance with law;

d) For division of the properties devolved upon the Estate of Late C.Shyamalavalli as legal heir of C.Sathyanarayanan mentioned in Schedule V more fully described in the plaint schedule hereunder to be divided into metes and bounds and allocate 1/3rd share to the plaintiffs jointly as the legal heirs of Late C.Sathyanarayanan in accordance with their entitlement;

e) For a declaration that the properties settled, by Late C.Shyamalavalli

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top