Back
A. D. JAGADISH CHANDIRA
E. S. Dilli Raj (M/37) – Appellant
Versus
State rep. by the Inspector of Police, Chennai – Respondent
JUDGMENT
(Prayer: Criminal Original petition is filed under Section 439 of Criminal Procedure Code, to enlarge the Petitioners on bail in Crime No.81 of 2022.)
1. The Criminal Original Petition has been filed seeking to enlarge the Petitioners/Accused on bail pending investigation in Crime No.81 of 2022 on the file of the respondent.
2. The case of the prosecution, as evinced from the complaint lodged by the de facto complainant, Naresh Kumar, in brief, is as under:-
The de facto complainant belongs to DMK, a political party. In his capacity as such, he was watching the election process on 19.2.2022, at about 4.30 pm, by standing near the polling booth at Ward No.49, Kamaraj Matriculation School at Sanjeeviraya Kovil Street and by that time, the Former Minister Mr.D.Jayakumar alongwith the Petitioners and some other persons in 20 two wheelers, had come to the polling station with the AIADMK flag hoisted on his car, who had attempted to trespass into the polling booth. When the de facto complainant had questioned them, the Former Minister Mr.Jayakumar had abused him with filthy language and stating as to how dare he was to question a Former Minister, had instigated his associates to ass
The court's decision emphasized the importance of considering individual circumstances and imposing appropriate conditions when granting bail in criminal cases.
Granting bail based on completion of preliminary investigation, discharge of the injured victim, and formal objection of possible tampering with the investigation by the respondent.
The court emphasized that prolonged detention without conclusive evidence and the absence of flight risk warrant the granting of bail.
Court directs expeditious bail consideration recognizing political rivalry over caste atrocity in SC/ST case.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the consideration of evidence, including the post-mortem report and witness statements, in granting bail for serious offences.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that bail can be granted based on the lack of direct evidence, incomplete investigation, and potential political motivations behind the accusation.
The court established that in bail applications, the nature of accusations and the progress of investigation are critical factors, and undue delay in investigation may favor granting bail.
Bail granted when investigation progresses and custodial period is significant, with strict conditions imposed.
Prolonged detention without identification of accused is unjustified; bail granted to petitioners with conditions.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
