IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
R. PONGIAPPAN, J.
Narasiman & Others - Appellant
Versus
State rep. by its Inspector of Police, Arakkonam All Women Police Station, Ranipettai & Another - Respondent
Crl.A. No. 253 of 2022
Decided On : 23-03-2022
Bail - Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Amendment Act, 2015 - Gang Rape - Abuse based on Caste Name - Enlargement on Bail
Fact of the Case:
The appellants, fathers of the main accused in a gang rape case, were arrested and sought bail. They were accused of abusing the defacto complainant by mentioning her caste name.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the appellants were not directly involved in the offence of rape and had no bad antecedents. It granted bail to the appellants based on the completion of a portion of the investigation and the lack of direct involvement in the offence.
Issues: The main issue was whether the appellants should be granted bail despite being accused of abusing the defacto complainant by mentioning her caste name.
Ratio Decidendi: The court decided to grant bail to the appellants based on the fact that they were not directly involved in the offence of rape and had no bad antecedents. It also considered the completion of a portion of the investigation and the lack of direct involvement in the offence.
Final Decision: The court set aside the previous order and granted bail to the appellants with specific conditions.
JUDGMENT
(Prayer: Criminal Appeal filed under Section 14A (2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Amendment Act, 2015 to set aside the order passed by the learned Special Judge for Exclusive Trial of Cases under POCSO Act, 2012, Vellore, Vellore District dated 04.02.2022 in Crl.MP.No.12 of 2022 in Cr.No.20 of 2021 of Arakkonam All Women Police Station, Ranipettai District and to enlarge the appellants on bail.)
1. Being dissatisfied with the order dated 04.02.2022, made in Crl.MP.No.12 of 2022 on the file of the learned Special Judge for Exclusive Trial of Cases under POCSO Act, Vellore, Vellore District, the appellants who are arrayed as accused No.4 to 6 in the above referred crime No.20 of 2021 on the file of the Inspector of Police, Arakkonam All Women Police Station, filed this appeal praying to set aside the order dated 04.02.2022 and to enlarge them on bail.
2. The case of the prosecution is that the appellants’ sons who are the main accused arrayed as A1 to A3 had committed gang rape over the victim girl. When at the time the defacto complainant approached these appellants, the appellants who are the fathers of A1 to A3, they abused the defacto complainant by mentioning her caste name. Later, upon the complaint given by the defacto complainant, the present case has been registered against the appellants and other accused. After registering the case, the appellants were arrested on 03.01.2022 and afterwards, they were in the judicial custody till date.
3. The learned counsel appearing for the appellants would contend that there was no overtact against these appellants for the alleged offence under Section 376 of IPC. Further, during the relevant point of time, the appellants have not used any abusive words and not insulted the defacto complainant. According to him, the appellants are in judicial custody from 03.01.2022 onwards. Hence, he prays for bail to the appellants.
4. The learned Government Advocate (crl.side) appearing for the first respondent police raised objection stating that investigation is pending. However he admits the witnesses who are all required for proving the alleged offence are all examined and statement also been recorded.
5. This court ordered to issue notice to the defacto complainant and after receipt of the said notice, none appeared on behalf of the defacto complainant. Therefore, this appeal has been decided upon the submissions made by the counsel appearing for the appellants and the learned Government Advocate(crl.side) appearing for the first respondent police.
6. The averments found in the first information report would disclose the fact that the appellants herein are not directly involved in the offence of rape. Only at the time the defacto complainant informed about the act committed by A1 to A3, the appellants abused her by mentioning her caste name. Except the said overtact, nothing has been stated as against these appellants. Further, the appellants are in the judicial custody from 03.01.2022 onwards. As of now, portion of investigation has been completed and other accused are also secured. There is no bad antecedents reported against these appellants. Hence, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the appellants.
7. Accordingly, the order passed by the learned Special Judge for Exclusive Trial of Cases under POCSO Act, 2012, Vellore, Vellore District dated 04.02.2022 in Crl.MP.No.12 of 2022 is set aside and the appellants are enlarged on bail on the following conditions:
(a) the appellants are ordered to be released on bail on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) (each) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Special Judge for Exclusive Trial of Cases under POCSO Act, 2012, Vellore, Vellore District
(b) the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the learned Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar Card or Bank Pass Book to ensure their identity;
(c
The main legal point established in the judgment is that bail can be granted based on the lack of direct involvement in the offence and other relevant factors, even when accused of related misconduct....
The court's decision to grant bail was based on the consideration of various factors, including the completion of a portion of the investigation, the victim child's medical examination, the absence o....
Compliance with bail conditions and being in judicial custody can influence the decision to grant bail.
The court considered the nature of the allegations and the appellant's custody period in deciding to grant bail with conditions.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the consideration of the appellant's custody, previous cases, and specific allegations in determining eligibility for bail in a case involving the ....
The court considered the stage of investigation and the period of incarceration in granting bail to the appellant.
The court has the discretion to grant bail with specific conditions, taking into account the period of incarceration, the appellant's criminal history, and the complainant's apprehension.
Consideration of completion of investigation, first offender status, and period of incarceration in granting bail under the POCSO Act and the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atroc....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.