N. ANAND VENKATESH
Arulmighu Palapattarai Mariamman Tirukoil, Rep. by its Executive Officer, Namakkal – Appellant
Versus
Pappayee – Respondent
JUDGMENT
(Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of C.P.C., against the Judgment and Decree dated 28.03.2012 in A.S.No.48 of 2011 on the file of the Additional District Court Judge, Namakkal, reversing the judgment and decree in O.S.No.683 of 2005, dated 31.10.2007 on the file of the Principal District Munsif's Court, Namakkal.)
1. The 1st defendant is the appellant in this Second Appeal.
2. The 1st and 2nd respondents/plaintiffs filed the suit seeking for the relief of permanent injunction against the 1st defendant and to restrain the 1st defendant from interfering with the usage of the suit property by putting up any structure or barricade and thereby, prevent the ingress and egress to the property belonging to the plaintiffs. The plaintiffs also sought for the relief of mandatory injunction to restore the suit AB portion to its original position.
3. The case of the plaintiffs is that they became entitled to the properties on the demise of their mother on 20.01.1984. According to the plaintiffs, the portion shown as AB in the rough plan filed along with the suit is a street called as Mariamman Koil Street which is classified as a Poramboke in the revenue records and it is a pu
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.