SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Mad) 1522

G. CHANDRASEKHARAN
Saradha Ammal – Appellant
Versus
J. Sridhar – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Appellants:P. Dinesh Kumar for M/s. M. Nandhakumar, Advocates. For the Respondent:R. Subramanian, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

(Prayer: This Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code against the judgment and decree dated 31.08.2018 made in A.S.No.14 of 2013 on the file of the learned Subordinate Judge, Kancheepuram, reversing the judgment and decree dated 21.12.2012 made in O.S.No.1062 of 2008 on the file of the learned District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Sriperumbudur.)

This Second Appeal is filed challenging the judgment and decree of learned Subordinate Judge, Kancheepuram, in A.S.No.14 of 2013 dated 31.08.2018 reversing the judgment and decree of the learned District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Sriperumbudur in O.S.No.1062 of 2008 dated 21.12.2012.2. Respondent filed the suit for declaration of his title to 'B' schedule property and for recovery of possession from the appellants and for costs.

3. The case of the respondent, as seen from the plaint, in brief is as follows:-

He is the absolute owner of 'A' schedule property. He got title to this property by virtue of a registered partition deed dated 04.12.2013. It is an ancestral property. His grand father was having a rice mill in the suit village. First appellant's father-in-law Chinnappan was employed under him. D

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top