SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Mad) 1931

A. A. NAKKIRAN
N. Kalamani – Appellant
Versus
S. Velusamy – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant:G. Karthikeyan, Advocate. For the Respondents:C.R. Prasanan, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

(Prayer: This Appeal Suit has been filed, under Section 96 & Order XLI Rule 1 of CPC as against the Judgment and decree dated 30.07.2014 passed in O.S No.646 of 2011 by the learned I Additional District Judge, Coimbatore.)

(This case has been heard through Video Conferencing)

This appeal has been filed, challenging the Judgment and decree, dated 30.07.2014, passed in O.S.No.646 of 2011 on the file of the learned I Additional District Judge, Coimbatore.

2. For the sake of convenience, the parties are hereinafter referred to as “plaintiffs" and "defendant" as has been arrayed before the trial Court”.

3. The case of the plaintiffs is as follows:

The property described in the plaint schedule is the self-acquired properties of late Kaliathal @ Kaliammal. The plaintiffs and the defendant are the children of late Kaliathal @ Kaliammal. On 12.12.2010, the said Kaliathal @ Kaliammal died intestate leaving behind the plaintiffs and the defendant as her legal heirs. The Plaintiffs further stated that their father predeceased their mother. Therefore, as per the Hindu Succession Act, the plaintiffs and the defendant are the legal heirs of late Kaliathal @ Kaliammal and they are entitled to 1

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top