2022 Supreme(Mad) 1962
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
M. DHANDAPANI, J.
Hadja Nadjoumoudine, Rep. by Power Agent Shiek Dawood Sarah Ummal & Another - Appellant
Versus
The Union of India, Rep. by the Government, Revenue Department, Government of Pondicherry, Pondicherry & Another - Respondent
W.P. No. 16762 of 2014
Decided On : 09-06-2022
For the Petitioners:V. Raghavachari, Advocate. For the Respondents: J. Kumaran, Additional Government Pleader (Pondy).
Entitlement to compensation under the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013.
Headnote:
Land Acquisition - Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 - Section 4(1) and Section 6 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - G.O.No.62 dated 18.02.2011 - Section 11A of the Land Acquisition Act - Award under RFCTLARR Act, 2013
Fact of the Case:
The petitioners' land was acquired for a public purpose of formation of Western By-Pass Road, Karaikal District. Notification under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act was issued in the year 2010 and declaration under Section 6 of the Land Acquisition Act was published in the year 2011. However, award was not passed in time. Final award was passed under the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (RFCTLARR). The petitioners claimed compensation under the new Act.
Finding of the Court:
The court directed the petitioners to file appropriate original documents for title deed within two weeks. On receipt of the original title deed documents, if in order, the respondents were directed to pay the compensation to the petitioners under the RFCTLARR Act, 2013 within four weeks thereafter.
Issues: Delay in passing the award, entitlement to compensation under the new Act, failure to produce original documents for compensation.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that since the award was passed under the new Act, the petitioners were entitled to receive compensation as per the new Act. The court directed the petitioners to produce the original title deed documents for verification and disbursement of compensation.
Final Decision: The writ petition was disposed of with the direction for the petitioners to produce original title deed documents for compensation and for the respondents to pay compensation under the new Act within four weeks of verification.
JUDGMENT
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorari to call for records in G.O.No.62 dated 18.02.2011 issued by 1st respondent published in Government Gazette on 02.03.2011 and quash the same as illegal, incompetent and unconstitutional.)
1. The writ petition has been filed challenging the G.O.No.62 dated 18.02.2011 issued by 1st respondent published in Government Gazette on 02.03.2011.
2. The case of the petitioner is that the property situated in Ward K Block 7 in T.S.No.36/2 in Oduthurai Village, Neravy Commune, Karaikal and the property in Ward K Block 7 in T.S.No.36/3/2 in Oduthurai Village, Neravy Commune, Karaikal, originally belonged to the petitioner's father, K.Mohamed Abdullah and his mother, A.Kanima Ummal, respectively. Presently, petitioners as the legal heirs, are in possession of the properties. In the year 2010, the Government of Puducherry by its G.O.No.36, Revenue and Disaster Management Department dated 05.10.2010 issued notification under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 for acquisition of an extent of 34.78.49 Hectares in Karaikal District for the purpose of formation of Western By-pass Road, stretching over eight Revenue villages. Thereafter, the department issued notification under Section 6 of the Land Acquisition Act in G.O.Ms.No.62 dated 18.02.2011 and the same was published in Government Gazette on 02.03.2011. Thereafter, the Sub/Deputy Collector (Revenue) cum Land Acquisition Officer issued notice dated 13.09.2013, directing the petitioners to represent their claim for compensation in respect to the land acquisition and the petitioners made a reply dated 11.10.2013 claiming compensation at Rs.400/- per sq.ft. However, the first respondent had not looked into this matter for about two years. On 25.09.2013, the first respondent had awarded an inadequate compensation of Rs.11,34,851/- and Rs.45,827/- in respect of the above said properties. After receipt of notice of award under Section 12(2) of the Land Acquisition Act, the petitioners made appearance on 11.10.2013 in the office of the first respondent and filed their claim statement demanding a higher compensation and the compensation amount was not determined in terms of Section 11A of the Land Acquisition Act. Since the award was passed after the lapse of two years, the entire proceedings had lapsed. Hence, the present writ petition has been filed.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that initially notification under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act was published on 05.10.2010, however, Section 6 Declaration notice was issued on 02.03.2011. It is sufficient to quash the entire acquisition proceedings. However, it appears that the road has already been laid and has been put to public use, this Court may direct the respondents to pay the compensation under the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, which was paid to the similarly situated persons as mentioned in paragraph 4 of the letter dated 19.04.2022 filed by the respondents. Accordingly, he prayed for appropriate orders.
4. Learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents would submit that notification under Section 4(1) of Land Acquisition Act was issued in the year 2010 and declaration under Section 6 of Land Acquisition Act was published in the year 2011. After passing the proceedings under Section 17(3) of Land Acquisition Act, paper publication was issued for payment of compensation. The individual land owners were also served notices through the concerned Village Administrative Officers for producing the valid original title deeds and to receive the compensation. But the petitioners did not turn up to produce the original documents for getting the compensation amount. Further, the possession of the land was already taken and handed over to the Public Works Department on 30.10.2013. The