SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Bom) 3579

HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MANISH PITALE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHREERAM VINAYAK SHIRSAT
ROSHAN SHRIKANT TANDEL – Appellant
Versus
COMMISSIONER-KONKAN DIV. AND ORS. – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1389 OF 2020 Roshan Shrikant Tandel … Petitioner Vs.

Commissioner-Konkan Division and others … Respondents Mr. Sachin Punde a/w. Ms. Deepa Punde for Petitioner.

Ms. P. M. J. Deshpande, AGP for Respondent Nos.1, 2 and 4.

Mr. Naushad Engineer a/w. Mr. Soham Bhalerao and Mr. Harshit Tyagi i/b. DSK Legal for Respondent No.3-CIDCO.

CORAM : MANISH PITALE &

SHREERAM V. SHIRSAT, JJ. Reserved on : APRIL 06, 2026 Pronounced on: MAY 05, 2026 JUDGEMENT : (Per Justice Manish Pitale . The petitioner in this petition contends that in the light of an admitted position on facts that the subject land located in Survey No.106/6 was never acquired and compensation was not paid, the respondents need to undertake steps for acquisition of the said land under the provisions of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (Act of 2013). It is the case of the petitioner that even though notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (L.A. Act) and declaration under Section 6 thereof were issued in the context of the said land, for acquisition al

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top