SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Mad) 1997

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S.M. SUBRAMANIAM, J.
S. Ravindran - Appellant
Versus
The Secretary to Government, Public (Special A) Department, Chennai & Another - Respondent
WP No.14796, 15570 of 2014, 31764, 15684 & 15685 of 2015
Decided On : 14-06-2022

Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner:S. Sivakumar, Advocate. For the Respondents: S. Anitha, Special Government Pleader.

Headnote:

Mandamus - Pay Parity - The court directed the respondents to consider the claim of the petitioners for pay parity based on their representations and pass orders expeditiously.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioners sought a writ of mandamus to upgrade their positions and step up their pay to achieve pay parity with their juniors.

Finding of the Court:

The court directed the respondents to consider the petitioners' claim for pay parity and pass orders expeditiously.

Issues: Pay parity between seniors and juniors, implementation of Government Orders, service records verification.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the need to consider the petitioners' claim for pay parity based on their representations and directed the respondents to take expeditious action.

Final Decision: The court directed the respondents to consider the petitioners' claim for pay parity and pass orders expeditiously, disposing of all the writ petitions.

JUDGMENT

(Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to upgrade the petitioner as Joint Secretary to Government and step up his pay on par with his junior and sanction the arrears of pay and allowances with interest to the petitioner.)

Common Order:

The relief sought for in these writ petitions is to direct the respondents to upgrade the petitioners as Joint Secretary to Government and step up their pay on par with their junior and sanction the arrears of pay and allowances with interest to the petitioners.

2. The petitioners were appointed as Assistants in Tamil Nadu Secretariat Service through Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission (TNPSC). The petitioners were promoted to the post of Assistant Section Officers and further to the post of Section Officers. The petitioners were promoted as Joint Secretaries and posted in the Department of Environment and Forest.

3. The grievances of the petitioners are that there is a pay parity in between the juniors and seniors and in this regard, several representations were submitted by the aggrieved employees. In order to rectify the anomaly between the seniors in One Unit and the juniors in Finance Unit, up-gradations/stepping up of pay of seniors on par with their juniors were granted by the Government in G.O.Ms.No.31, Personnel and Administrative Reforms Department, dated 01.03.2017. The grievances of the writ petitioners are that in spite of the Government Order passed in this regard, no further action has been taken to grant the actual benefits.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioners mainly contended that para-11 of the said Government Order in G.O.Ms.No.31, is to be implemented with reference to the grievances of the petitioners. The list of eligible seniors for stepping up of pay on par with their juniors were also issued by the Government in letter dated 04.11.2020. Thus, the Government Order and the consequential letter dated 04.11.2020 are to be implemented for the purpose of stepping up of pay of the writ petitioners on par with their juniors within one Unit.

5. The learned Special Government Pleader appearing on behalf of the respondents made a submission that the applicability or otherwise of the Government Orders are to be verified with reference to the service records of the petitioners concerned.

6. In view of the further developments regarding the issuance of Government Order in G.O.Ms.No.31, the cases of the writ petitioners are also to be reconsidered along with other similary placed persons who have submitted their representations for stepping up of pay.

7. Considering the facts and circumstances, the respondents are directed to consider the claim of the writ petitioners based on their representations and accordingly take decision and pass orders on merits and in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

8. With the above directions, all the writ petitions stand disposed of. However, there shall be no order as to costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top