SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Mad) 2569

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J.
Anita Gaur & Others - Appellant
Versus
The Auroville Foundation, Auroville Foundation Bhavan, Auroville –Rep. by its Under Secretary & Others - Respondent
W.P. Nos. 8675, 11738 and 14707 of 2022 & WMP Nos.13910, 15881, 15882, 15885, 8588, 13912, 13913, 15889, 8587, 15887, 11199, 17055 of 2022
Decided On : 12-08-2022

Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioners:Sriram Panchu for B.N. Suchindran, H.S. Hredai for M.V. Swaroop, Advocates. For the Respondents:R1, Vijay Narayan, Senior Advocate for M/s. Rajan, R2 to R5, Nithyaesh Natraj, Advocates.

Headnote:(A) Auroville Foundation Act, 1988 - Sections 7, 11, 17, 18, 19, 20 - Various writ petitions regarding the Auroville Foundation - Conflicts arose from the Governing Board's actions, including restricting the Residents-Assembly and unilaterally appointing new executives without proper consultation. (Paras 2, 3, 53, 60, 64, 69)

(B) The court held that the Governing Board cannot act unilaterally without consulting the Residents-Assembly, emphasizing the requirement for mutual consultation and adherence to procedures established in the Act. (Paras 53, 62, 69)

Facts of the case:
Disputes among residents regarding the functioning of the Auroville Foundation, specifically surrounding the update of the Register of Residents, and conflicting office orders issued by the Governing Board and its Secretary. (Paras 1-8)

Findings of Court:
The impugned orders that restricted the Residents-Assembly and reconstituted the Town Development Council were quashed due to lack of compliance with statutory procedures. (Paras 69, 70)

Issues: 1) Can the Governing Board restrict the Residents-Assembly functions without updating the Register of Residents? 2) Is the unilateral appointment of new executives to Auroville Outreach Media valid? 3) Did the reconstitution of the Auroville Town Development Council violate jurisdiction? (Paras 3, 4, 60)

Ratio Decidendi: The Court found that the Governing Board's actions were impermissible due to the failure to engage the Residents-Assembly as mandated by the Auroville Foundation Act. (Paras 53, 64, 69)

Result: Writ petitions allowed; impugned office orders quashed.

Table of Content
1. writ petitions related to auroville foundation disputes. (Para 1 , 2)
2. issues for consideration regarding auroville assembly. (Para 3 , 4)
3. claims and counterclaims from petitioners regarding resident assembly operations. (Para 5 , 6 , 7)
4. illegal actions and non-consultation in admin orders. (Para 10 , 12 , 13)
5. challenges to the reconstitution of auroville councils. (Para 16 , 18)
6. arguments against the legitimacy of regulatory actions. (Para 23 , 24)
7. nature of the auroville foundation and its mandates. (Para 26 , 30 , 38)
8. requirements for policy decisions in auroville. (Para 28 , 29 , 60 , 62)
9. court's reasoning on authority and consultation requirements. (Para 54)
10. final directives on updating register of residents. (Para 66 , 70)

JUDGMENT

(Prayer in W.P. No.8675 of 2022: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records and quashing the impugned Office Order dated 09.02.2022, bearing No.AF/Misc/31, passed by the respondent.

Prayer in W.P. No.11738 of 2022: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records and quashing the impugned order No.491 also bearing No.AF/M/63/dated 15.07.2021 passed by the respondent.

Prayer in W.P. No.14707 of 2022: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records and to quash the communication dated 6.5.2022 issued by the 1st respondent and consequentially forbear respondents 1-5 from interfering with the working of the Residents- Assembly, and their lawfully constituted Working Committee under Section 20 of the Auroville Foundation Act, 1988.

Common Order:

The World knows “Auroville” is an haven of unity and peace. But however, of late, it is disheartening to know that the sweat, blood and tears of its founders namely “Sir Aurobindo” and “The Mother” are getting shattered due to the infighting between some of the groups in Auroville. The philosophy of an Aurovillian is based on “peace of humanity” and “unity in diversity”. During the Auroville inauguration by the Mother in the year 1968, youth from 124 different nations and 23 Indian states, deposited a handful of their native soil into the Urn, a marble clad structure in the form of a symbolic lotus bud, located in the centre of the Amphitheare. The Auroville charter was handwritten by the Mother in French and rests along with the soil, sealed in the Urn, as a powerful message and promise for the Aurovillian Society and the entire world at large.

2. These writ petitions arise out of a dispute between some of the residents of Auroville and the Governing Body, a statutory body under the Auroville Foundation Act, 1988.

3. The issues that arise for consideration in these writ petitions are as follows :- a) Whether the Governing Board of the Auroville Foundation can restrict the functioning of the Residents- Assembly on account of the alleged non updation of the Register of Residents and on account of the alleged ongoing activities of the Residents- Assembly, which according to the Governing Board as seen from the impugned communication dated 06.05.2022 has resulted in disfunctional state of affairs and has let to a complete policy paralysis. The subject matter of this issue is W.P. No.14707 of 2022.

b) Whether the impugned office order dated 09.02.2022 passed by the Governing Board of the Auroville Foundation appointing official spokespersons as Executives of “Auroville Outreach Media” with immediate effect replacing the current Executive Ms.Fabienne Marechal without the consent of the Residents- Assembly is valid. The subject matter of this issue is W.P. No.8675 of 2022.

c) Whether the impugned office order dated 15.07.2021 reconstituting the Auroville Town Development Council by inducting new Members by the Governing Board is an excess of the Governing Board-s jurisdiction under the A

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top