Back
N. ANAND VENKATESH
K. Dilli Babu – Appellant
Versus
Sub Registrar, Chennai – Respondent
JUDGMENT
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ of declaration declaring that the deed of cancellation executed by the 2nd respondent on 05.11.2014 and registered as Document No.2772 of 2014 at the office of the 1st respondent cancelling the settlement deed dated 05.05.2014 registered as Document No.1103 of 2014 at the office of the 1st respondent as null and void and that such document does not affect the petitioners right over the property being the 497 sq.ft. of land together with house therein being the middle portion of the property comprised in T.S.No.99 Block No.177 of Kodambakkam Village bearing Old Door No.26 New Door No.61 Plot No.2461 Kabilar Street MGR Nagar Chennai 78 Mambalam - Guindy Taluk Chennai measuring an extent of 138.50 Sq.M. Or 149 sq.ft.)
(1) This writ petition has been filed challenging the registration of the Cancellation Deed dated 05.11.2014 whereby the Settlement Deed dated 05.05.2014 was unilaterally cancelled by the 2nd respondent.
(2) The case of the petitioner is that he is the brother of the 2nd respondent. The 2nd respondent came forward to execute a Settlement Deed with respect to the sub
Unilateral cancellation of a settlement deed is not permissible and is against the provisions of the Registration Act, 1908.
Unilateral cancellation of a settlement deed is impermissible and against public policy, as supported by the Transfer of Property Act and the Registration Act.
A writ petition is not maintainable to challenge the registration of a cancellation deed executed unilaterally by the settlor of a settlement deed. The proper remedy for the aggrieved party is to fil....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that once a document is registered, it cannot be cancelled by the Sub-Registrar unilaterally, and the appropriate remedy for disputes on facts and ....
Unilateral cancellation of a Sale Deed is impermissible under the Registration Act, 1908.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the Registering Authority has no power to unilaterally cancel a settlement deed, and such unilateral cancellation is void and non-est in law.
Unilateral cancellation of a registered sale deed is illegal; only a civil court has the authority to cancel such documents.
Unilateral cancellation of a Sale Deed does not create, assign, limit, or extinguish any right, title, or interest in the property and is of no effect.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
