SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Mad) 2690

D. BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY
B. Babu – Appellant
Versus
Public Prosecutor, Coimbatore – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner:C.D. Sugumar, Advocate. For the Respondents:S. Vinoth Kumar, Government Advocate (Crl.side).

JUDGMENT

(Prayer: Criminal Revision Case filed under Section 397 read with 401 Code of Criminal Procedure, to set aside the order dated 13.07.2022 passed in Crl.M.P.No.3332 of 2022 in C.A.No.42 of 2022 by the Learned Principal & Sessions Judge, against the Judgment dated 30.06.2022 passed in S.C.No.225 of 2017, on the file of the First Additional Assistant Court, Coimbatore, and to allow this revision.)

1. This Criminal revision is filed aggrieved by the order of the Learned Principal & Sessions Judge, Coimbatore, dated 13.07.2022 in Crl.M.P.No.3332 of 2022 in and by which, the prayer of the petitioner, to suspend the sentence and enlarge him on bail, pending disposal of the appeal in C.A.No.42 of 2022, was rejected by the learned Sessions Judge.

2. The petitioner was convicted by the Learned Assistant Sessions Judge, in S.C.No.225 of 2017 for the offence punishable under Section 307 of IPC, and imposed the maximum imprisonment of seven years Rigorous Imprisonment. Apart from this, he was acquitted from the offences under Sections 294(b) and 506(ii) of IPC.

3. Upon the appeal being moved, while making the appeal over to the IV-Additional District and Sessions Judge, the learned Session

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top