Back
V. M. VELUMANI, S. SOUNTHAR
Shriram General Insurance Co. Ltd. , Coimbatore – Appellant
Versus
Tamilselvi – Respondent
JUDGMENT
(Prayer: This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the judgment and decree dated 20.02.2018, made in M.C.O.P.No.1898 of 2014, on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, I Additional District Court, Tiruppur.
This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the judgment and decree dated 20.02.2018, made in M.C.O.P.No.1964 of 2014, on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, I Additional District Court, Tiruppur.
This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the judgment and decree dated 20.02.2018, made in M.C.O.P.No.1964 of 2014, on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, I Additional District Court, Tiruppur.)
Common Judgment"
V.M. Velumani, J.
1. C.M.A.No.2879 of 2018 has been filed by the appellant-Insurance Company against the award dated 20.02.2018, made in M.C.O.P.No.1898 of 2014, on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, I Additional District Court, Tiruppur.
2. C.M.A.No.2641 of 2019 has been fil
The main legal point established in the judgment is the apportionment of negligence between the parties involved in the accident and the determination of compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act.
The court emphasized just compensation post-accident by adjusting the initially awarded amount, reinforcing the significance of negligent parties in determining liability and ensuring just outcomes i....
The judgment establishes the principle of contributory negligence and provides a detailed framework for calculating compensation in motor accident claims.
The main legal point established is the determination of negligence in a motor accident case and the calculation of compensation based on notional income and future prospects.
The assessment of compensation in motor accident claims must consider contributory negligence and actual earning capacity of the deceased.
The court established that both the Tanker Lorry driver and the deceased contributed to the accident, attributing 85% negligence to the driver, while also correcting the compensation calculation base....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the determination of liability and quantum of compensation in a motor accident case under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.
The court upheld the Tribunal's finding of sole negligence by the lorry driver, determining compensatory adjustments based on established income precedents.
For age group of deceased, who was aged 47 years, for self-employed persons, future prospects was required to be taken at 25%.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
