SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Mad) 2812

P. VELMURUGAN
John Bau – Appellant
Versus
F. M. Antony – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Cross Objector:V.M. Balamohan Thampi, Advocate. For the Respondents:R. Murali, M/s. V.J. Latha, Advocates.

JUDGMENT

(Prayer: Cross-Objection filed under Order 42 Rule 22 of Civil Procedure Code praying this Court to dismiss A.S.No.10 of 2004 with costs and to modify the decree of the Lower Court for Specific Performance of sale of 10 acres out of 20 acres 12 cents of the suit schedule property and to direct the first appellant/defendant to execute the sale deed and on his failure, to execute the sale through the process of Court.)

1. The Cross-Objection is filed seeking to dismiss A.S.No.10 of 2004 with costs and to modify the decree of the Lower Court for Specific Performance of sale of 10 acres out of 20 acres 12 cents of the suit schedule property and to direct the first appellant/defendant to execute the sale deed and on his failure, to execute the sale through the process of Court.

2. Since the appeal suit is dismissed, Cross-Objection filed by the Cross-Objector is treated as an appeal.

3. The Plaintiff is the Cross-Objector and the defendants are the respondents in the present Cross-Objection. The defendants have filed the appeal suit in A.S.No.10 of 2004 and the same was dismissed on 28.07.2017 along with the same,the present Cross-objection is filed. The appellant as plaintiff has

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top