SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Mad) 2826

J. NISHA BANU
Pethanna – Appellant
Versus
P. Krishnasamy – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant:C. Kulanthaivel, Advocate. For the Respondents:R1, Given up, R2, M/s. R.T. Sundari, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

(Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, to set aside the Decree and Judgment made in MCOP No.414 of 2010 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal Cum Fast Track Court No.4, Bhavani, Erode District dated 08.03.2012.)

1. The injured claimant has filed this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal seeking enhancement of compensation. The main ground raised in this appeal is that 50% negligence fixed on the injured claimant and thereby reducing the Compensation to that extent by the Tribunal, is not sustainable.

2. As per the averments in the claim petition, on 08.05.2010, at about 01.00 P.M, the claimant boarded in the TNSTC Bus at Erode bearing Reg.No.TN-33-N-1821 and when he tried to get down from the said bus at Savidipalayam Pudur, Maligai Kadai Bus stop, the 1st respondent moved the bus even before the claimant got down from the bus. Due to which, the claimant fell down from the bus and sustained fracture and bleeding injuries. Therefore, the claimant filed MCOP No.414 of 2010 seeking compensation for a sum of Rs.10,00,000/-.

3. Before














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top