SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Mad) 2937

C. V. KARTHIKEYAN
Periyasamy (died) – Appellant
Versus
Santhi Krishnan – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Appellants:N. Alamelumangai, Advocate. For the Respondent:T.R. Rajaraman, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

(Prayer: This Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code, against the Decree and Judgment dated 08.02.2005 in A.S.No. 7 of 2004 on the file of the Principal Sub Judge, Salem, confirming the decree and Judgment of the trial Court dated 09.02.2004 passed in O.S.No. 565 of 2002 on the file of the Principal District Munsif of Salem.)

1. The defendants in O.S.No. 565 of 2002 on the file of the Principal District Munsif Court at Salem, are the appellants herein. Pending the Appeal, the first appellant died but his legal representatives were already on record as 2nd to 5th appellants. A memo filed in that regard had been recorded.

2. The suit in O.S.No. 565 of 2002 had been filed by the respondent Santhi Krishnan against the defendants Periyasamy and his sons Murugesan, Ramakrishnan, Sengottaiyan and Vivekanandan, seeking a Judgment and Decree in the nature of permanent injunction restraining the defendants from interfering with her peaceful possession and enjoyment of the suit schedule properties and for costs.

3. The suit schedule properties were agricultural lands in patta Nos. 772, 623 and 654 in Kothanur Village, Salem.

4. By Judgment dated 09.02.2004, the l

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top