SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Mad) 3009

C. V. KARTHIKEYAN
Kandasamy – Appellant
Versus
Ammasai Gounder (Deceased) – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Appellants:P. Valliappan, Advocate. For the Respondents: R2 to R4 & R4 to R7, K. Govi Ganesan, R8, R10 to R12, No appearance.

JUDGMENT

(Prayer: This Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code, against the Judgment and Decree of the learned Subordinate Court, Tiruppur dated 19.03.1996 and made in A.S.No. 23 of 1992 confirming the decree and Judgment of the learned District Munsif, Tiruppur, dated 25.02.1992 made in O.S.No. 713 of 1984.

This Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code, against the Judgment and Decree of the learned Subordinate Court, Tiruppur dated 19.03.1996 and made in A.S.No. 24 of 1992 confirming the decree and Judgment of the learned District Munsif, Tiruppur, dated 25.02.1992 made in O.S.No. 301 of 1988.)

Commno Judgment:

1. The plaintiff, Kandasamy, in O.S. No. 713 of 1984, on the file of the District Munsif Court, Tiruppur is the appellant in Second Appeal No. 773 of 1997.

2. O.S. No. 713 of 1984 had been filed by P. Ganapathy Gounder, who died pending the suit, and whose son, Kandasamy was brought on record, against Ammasai Gounder, seeking permanent injunction, restraining the defendant from interfering with peaceful possession of the lands totally measuring 31.05 acres in one block in S.F. Nos. 529, 546, 547, 548 and 549 in Eattiveerampalayam

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top