Back
V. SIVAGNANAM
Kombaya Pandian – Appellant
Versus
Superintendent of Police, Thoothukudi – Respondent
JUDGMENT
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records pertaining to the impugned order passed by the 2nd respondent in his proceedings in Na.Ka.No.60/Mic/Ko.Me.Ka/2022 dated 01.07.2022 and quash the same as illegal, consequently directing the Respondents to grant permission and necessary protection to conduct the Adal Padal Programme on 07.08.2022 from 7.00 pm in connection with Thiru Vizha of Arulmigu Sri Sankaralingaswamy Sametha Sri Sankareshwari Ambal Thirukovil situated at Veeravaanchi Nagar, Kovilpatti, Thoothukudi District)
1. This writ petitioner filed this Writ Petition seeking for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records pertaining to the impugned order passed by the 2nd respondent in his proceedings in Na.Ka.No.60/Mic/Ko.Me.Ka/2022 dated 01.07.2022 and quash the same as illegal, consequently directing the Respondents to grant permission and necessary protection to conduct the Adal Padal Programme on 07.08.2022 from 7.00 pm in connection with Thiru Vizha of Arulmigu Sri Sankaralingaswamy Sametha Sri Sankareshwari Ambal Thirukovil situat
Administrative authorities cannot reject permission for cultural events based solely on presumptions of potential law and order problems without concrete evidence.
An administrative order denying permission for a public cultural event purely based on the presumption of a potential law and order problem without specific material is unsustainable and liable to be....
The High Court holds the authority under Article 226 of the Constitution to grant permission for cultural programs, provided they adhere to strict regulatory conditions to ensure public order, morali....
Administrative authorities cannot reject requests for cultural event permits based on mere apprehensions of law and order problems without demonstrating the existence of concrete material justifying ....
State authorities cannot reject applications for cultural/religious programs based solely on speculative or presumptive grounds of law and order issues without evidence of an actual threat.
Administrative authorities cannot reject permission for cultural events based on mere speculation of law and order concerns without providing concrete evidence or material justification.
An order rejecting permission for a temple cultural program based solely on vague apprehension of law and order issues, without concrete supporting material, is set aside as illegal.
The court's decision was influenced by the circular and guidelines issued by the Director General of Police, which formed the basis for directing the second respondent to consider the representation ....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
