SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Mad) 3132

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
MUNISHWAR NATH BHANDARI, N. MALA, JJ.
State of Tamil Nadu, rep. by its Secretary, Chennai & Another - Appellant
Versus
Srinivasan Medical College and Hospital, rep. by its Vice Chairman S. Kathiravan, Tiruchirapalli & Others - Respondent
W.A. Nos. 1398 & 1399 of 2022
Decided On : 12-07-2022

Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant:R. Shanmugasundaram, Advocate-General assisted by P. Muthukumar, State Government Pleader, A.G. Shakeena, Advocate, Amit Anand Tiwari, Additional Advocate General assisted by Devyani Gupta, Advocate. For the Respondents:Vijay Narayan, Senior Counsel, R2 & R3, K. Srinivasamurthy, Senior Panel Counsel, R1, Abishek Jenasenan, R4, Shubharanjani Ananth, R5, P.R. Gopinath, Advocates.

Headnote:(A) Tamil Nadu Dr. M.G.R. Medical University (Chennai) Act, 1987 - Section 6 - Tamil Nadu Private Universities Act, 2019 - Section 3(4) - Medical college seeking affiliation - The court ruled that the requirement for private institutions to affiliate with the Tamil Nadu Dr. M.G.R. Medical University is mandated under the Act, reaffirming the need for regulatory adherence in medical education. (Paras 6, 11, 47, 61)

(B) Autonomy of Private Universities - No autonomy is recognized over matters concerning affiliation and admission governed by the National Medical Commission and the Tamil Nadu regulations. The court emphasized that autonomy cannot violate statutory provisions intended to maintain educational standards. (Paras 4, 16, 70)

Facts of the case:
The State filed appeals against a decision that favored a private medical college’s inclusion in student counseling processes. The college argued against requirements for affiliation, suggesting it violated its autonomy as a private university under state law.

Findings of Court:
The court concluded that the learned Single Judge's order contradicted statutory provisions mandating affiliation to maintain medical education standards and that fee fixation procedures also required adherence to established regulatory guidelines.

Issues: The primary issue involved whether a private university must affiliate with Tamil Nadu Dr. M.G.R. Medical University for medical courses as mandated by law, alongside compliance with admission scheduling set by the Supreme Court.

Ratio Decidendi: The court found the requirement for affiliation to be a legislative mandate under Section 6 of the Act of 1987, upholding the integrity of medical education regulation against claims of institutional autonomy. The Governing framework established by statutory provisions is to ensure uniformity and quality in medical training across the state.

Result: Appeals allowed; judgment of the learned Single Judge is set aside.

Table of Content
1. nature of appeals filed by state against judgment (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5)
2. arguments regarding affiliation of institutions (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14)
3. arguments contesting the judgment of the single judge (Para 23 , 24 , 25)
4. legal arguments on the autonomy of educational institutions (Para 26 , 27 , 28)
5. court's conclusion on statutory requirements (Para 46 , 47 , 48)
6. regulatory mechanisms for fee determination (Para 70 , 71)
7. final conclusion and directive actions (Para 79 , 80 , 81 , 82 , 83)

JUDGMENT

(Prayer: Appeals under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the common order dated 29.4.2022 passed in W.P.Nos.1392 and 9236 of 2022.)

Common Judgment

1. The writ appeals have been filed by the State of Tamil Nadu and the Additional Director of Medical Education/Secretary, Selection Committee to assail the judgment of the learned Single Judge dated 29.4.2022, whereby the writ petitions preferred by Srinivasan Medical College and Hospital were allowed.

2. W.P.No.1392 of 2022 was filed by the writ petitioner/non-appellant to quash the notification dated 3.1.2022 and to consequently include the name of the writ petitioner/institution in the counselling process for allocation of students for filling up 35% of intake capacity of 150 seats allocated to the writ petitioner/ institution from the academic year 2021-2022 onwards. It was with a further prayer to consider the representation of the writ petitioner/institution dated 29.10.2021 and instruct the Directorate General of Health Services, New Delhi, to include the name of the writ petitioner/institution in the counselling process to be conducted for filling up 65% of the 150 MBBS seats to the writ petitioner/institution from the academic year 2021-2022 onwards.

3. The prayer in W.P.No.9236 of 2022 was to seek a direction on the respondents therein to consider the representation dated 10.4.2022 and include the name of the writ petitioner/institution in the counselling process and allot 150 candidates for the MBBS Course by following the apportionment of seats followed in the private self-financing medical institutions affiliated to the Tamil Nadu Dr.M.G.R.Medical University and by applying the fee structure fixed by the State Fee Committee for the private self-financing medical institutions in the State for the academic year 2021-2022.

4. The necessity to file the writ petitions arose when the second appellant issued a government notification dated 3.1.2022, which is quoted hereunder:

“KIND ATTENTION TO THE SELF FINANCING MEDICAL / DENTAL COLLEGES

The Self Financing Medical / Dental Institutions are informed that their Seat Matrix for MBBS / BDS courses for 2021-2022 will be included at the time of State / Management quota Counselling which have been affiliated by the Tamil Nadu Dr. MGR Medical University, Guindy, Chennai only.”

5. The aforesaid government notification contemplated that the self-financing medical/dental institutions having affiliation with the Tamil Nadu Dr.M.G.R. Medical University, Chennai, would only be included at the time of the counselling for allocation of the candidates for the MBBS Course against the State/Management quota.

6. Prior to the issuance of the aforesaid government notification, Dhanalakshmi Srinivasan University sent a detailed representation on 29.10.2021 to the effect that they need to fill 35% of the total seats as per the reservation policy of the Tamil Nadu State Government and as per the prevailing procedure of the Director General of Health Service, New Delhi, 100% MBBS seats of deemed to be universities are filled through Medical Counselling Committee and similar is the position in respect of Super-specialty seats and, therefore, a request was made to include the name of the writ petitioner/institution for MBBS counselling.

7. The said representation was followed by another representation dated 10.4.2022 of the Dhanalakshmi Srinivasan University to inform that they have got the letter of permission from the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top