SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Mad) 3191

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
R. SUBRAMANIAN, J.
M/S. Astalife, C/o. Elite Pharma, Represented by its Authorized Representative, Rep. by Jayant Surana, Chennai - Appellant
Versus
The Union of India, Through the Deputy Secretary, Department of Pharmaceuticals, Ministry of Chemicals and Fertilizers, New Delhi & Others - Respondent
WP. No. 18433 of 2017 & W.M.P. No. 19996 of 2017
Decided On : 27-07-2022

Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner:T.D. Selvan Babu, Advocate. For the Respondents: R1 & R2, T.L. Thirumalaisamy, Central Govt. Standing Counsel, R3, V. Yamunadevi, Special Government Pleader.

Interest is payable under Section 7A of the Essential Commodities Act only after the expiry of 15 days from the date of the demand, and the charging of interest is limited to the specific period of default.

Headnote:

Interest - Essential Commodities Act - Section 7A - [PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY, DRUGS, DEMAND NOTICE, RECOVERY ACT] - [Section 7A of the Essential Commodities Act] - The court discussed the interpretation of Section 7A of the Essential Commodities Act, which provides for charging of interest in cases where the amount demanded is not paid. The court held that interest is payable only after the expiry of 15 days from the date of the demand, and the respondents were entitled to charge interest only for the specific period of default, not for the earlier period as claimed by them.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner, a Pharmaceutical Company, was required to pay a sum towards interest on the overcharged amount. The respondents claimed that one of the drugs manufactured by the petitioner was sold at a price higher than the price fixed under the Drugs (Price Control) Order, 1995. The petitioner disputed the amount demanded and the interest charged against the terms of the provisions of the enactment.

Finding of the Court:

The court held that interest is payable only after the expiry of 15 days from the date of the demand, and the respondents were entitled to charge interest only for the specific period of default, not for the earlier period as claimed by them.

Issues: The issues revolved around the liability to pay interest, the interpretation of Section 7A of the Essential Commodities Act, and the calculation of the period of default for charging interest.

Ratio Decidendi: The court interpreted Section 7A of the Essential Commodities Act and concluded that interest is payable only after the expiry of 15 days from the date of the demand, and the respondents were entitled to charge interest only for the specific period of default, not for the earlier period as claimed by them.

Final Decision: The Writ petition was allowed, and the impugned demand was quashed. The respondents were directed to calculate the interest as per the court's directions, and the petitioner was ordered to pay the same. No costs were awarded, and the connected writ miscellaneous petition was closed.

JUDGMENT

(Prayer: Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ of certiorarified mandamus calling for the records of the 2nd respondent in Demand Notice F.No.21(2292)/2012/Div.IV/NPPA dated 7th/8th March, 2016 read with Order bearing Pro.No.G2/7291/2017 dated 25.05.2017 of the 3rd respondent at the behest of the 2nd respondent and quash the same and consequently forbear the respondents, their officers, men, agents and servants from demanding or collecting alleged interest amount/ arrears of interest amount from the petitioner by taking any coercive action against the petitioner, directly or through the revenue authorities in pursuance thereof.)

1. Challenge in the writ petition is to the order of the 2nd respondent requiring the petitioner to pay a sum of Rs.38,37,517/- towards interest on the over charged amount. The order impugned dated 07/08-03-2016 also states that action for recovery under the Revenue Recovery Act will be launched, if the amount demanded is not paid within 10 days from the date of receipt of the said notice.

2. The petitioner which is a Pharmaceutical Company had produced and marketed certain drugs. The respondents claim that one of the drugs manufactured by the petitioner viz., Ecosprin Gold 20 Forte capsules has been sold by the petitioner at a price higher than the price fixed under the Drugs (Price Control) Order, 1995.

3. A notice was issued to the petitioner under Section 3 of the Essential Commodities Act demanding a sum of Rs.2,86,08,105/-. The petitioner responded to the said notice claiming that the product viz., Ecosprin Gold 20 Forte capsules is a different drug combination from the products for which price have been fixed by the respondents under the Drugs (Price Control) Order, 1995. The petitioner also claimed that if at all it is liable to pay the difference in price that would only be to the extent of Rs.67,94,993/- and not Rs.2,86,08,105/- as demanded in the notice dated 08.10.2015. It appears that the respondents accepted the calculation of the petitioner and the amount as calculated by the petitioner viz., Rs.67,94,993/- was required to be paid and the same was paid on 30.11.2015.

4. After receipt of the entire amount on 30.11.2015, the Authority viz., Director of National Pharmaceutical Pricing Authority issued present impugned demand claiming an interest of Rs.38,37,517/-. The petitioner claimed that the interest charged is against the terms of the provisions of the enactment. However, the respondents issued the order impugned in the writ petition on 07/08-03-2016 requiring the petitioner to pay the interest.

5. Mr.T.D.Selvan Babu, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would contend that the liability to pay interest would arise only on the commission of default in payment of any amount due and payable to the Government. Relying upon Section 7A of the Essential Commodities Act which reads as follows:-

7A. Power of Central Government to recover certain amounts as arrears of land revenue:-

(1) Where any person, liable to –

(a) pay any amount in pursuance of any order made under section 3 or,

(b) deposit any amount to the credit of any Account of Fund constituted by or in pursuance of any order made under that section, makes any default in paying or depositing the whole or any part of such amount, the amount in respect of which such default has been made whether such order was made before or after the commencement of the Essential Commodities (Amendment) Act, 1984, and whether the liability of such person to pay or deposit such amount arose before or after such commencement be recoverable by Government together with simple interest due thereon computed at the rate of fifteen per cent per annum from the date of such default to the date of recovery of such amount, as an arrear of land revenue or as a Public Demand.

(2) The amount recovered under sub-section (1) shall be dealt with in accordance with the order which the l

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top