Back
P. T. ASHA
United India Insurance Co. Lted. , Chennai – Appellant
Versus
K. Anandan – Respondent
JUDGMENT
(Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the Judgment and Decree dated 15.12.2011 made in M.C.O.P.No.3043 of 2009 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (IV Judge, Court of Small Causes) at Chennai.)
1. The Insurance Company has challenged the Award passed in M.C.O.P.No.3043 of 2009 by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (IV Court of Small Causes, Chennai) on the ground of liability.
2. In order to appreciate the grievance of the Insurance Company, it is necessary to set out the facts that has let to the passing of the Award and in do so, the parties for the ease of understanding are referred to in the same rank as before the Tribunal.
3. The petitioner had filed the above claim petition seeking compensation of a sum of Rs.3,00,000/- for the injuries sustained by him in a road accident on 27.07.2009. The petitioner claims to be a freelance loadman, aged about 39 years. It is his case that on 27.07.2019 at about 5.30 hours, he was travelling in a tractor, bearing Registration No.TDH-6984 as loadman. The tractor was being driven by its driver in a rash and negligent manner, as it came near the L & T Company, P
The distinction between an employee and a gratuitous passenger under the insurance policy cover and the necessity for compliance with the provisions of the Motor Vehicles Act and policy conditions.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the insurance company is not statutorily required to cover the liability for an unauthorised passenger in a goods vehicle, based on the interp....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the interpretation of policy conditions, specifically regarding the coverage of the deceased under IMT 28, and the determination of liability for c....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the Insurance Company cannot be held liable for compensation when a passenger is traveling in a tractor.
An insurance company is not liable to indemnify for claims involving gratuitous passengers not covered under the policy as per statutory provisions.
In private employment like the one in the instant case, it is invariably of casual nature and the payments are often made by the hirer of vehicle and the statements of the witnesses required apprecia....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the insurance company is liable to pay compensation despite the claimant being a gratuitous passenger, and the contents of the FIR cannot be s....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the insurance company is liable to pay compensation for accidents involving the insured vehicle, even if the claimant is a gratuitous passenge....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
