SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Mad) 3449

P. VELMURUGAN
S. Dhandapani – Appellant
Versus
R. Thirupathi – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner:C.K.M. Appaji, Advocate. For the Respondent:V. Gunasekar, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

(Prayer: Criminal Revision filed under Section 397 read with 401 of Criminal Procedure Code, praying to set aside the Judgement of conviction imposed in C.A.No.112 of 2018 on the file of the III Additional Sessions Judge, Salem, confirming the Judgment in S.T.C.No.469 of 2015 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No.IV, Salem dated 20.06.2018.)

1. The Criminal Revision Case has been file seeking to set aside the Judgement in C.A.No.112 of 2018 on the file of the III Additional Sessions Judge, Salem, confirming the Judgment of conviction and sentence imposed in S.T.C.No.469 of 2015 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No.IV, Salem dated 20.06.2018.

2. The petitioner is the accused and the respondent is the complainant. The respondent had registered a private complaint against the petitioner under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.IV, Salem. The learned Magistrate taken the case on file in S.T.C.No.469 of 2015 and after trial, convicted the petitioner for the offence under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act and sentenced to undergo one year Simple Imprisonment and to pay the cheque amount of Rs.3 lakhs as compensation

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top