SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Mad) 3549

B. PUGALENDHI
P. Rajasekaran – Appellant
Versus
C. Kumar – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioners:H. Arumugam, Advocate. For the Respondent:J. Alaguram Jothi, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

(Prayer: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to set aside the judgment and decree passed in I.A.No.789 of 2015 in O.S.No.490 of 2009 dated 09.01.2018 on the file of the Principal Sub Court, Madurai by allowing this civil revision petition.)

1. This Civil Revision Petition is filed as against the fair and decreetal order passed in I.A.No.789 of 2015 in O.S.No.490 of 2009 dated 09.01.2018 by the learned Principal Sub Judge, Madurai.

2. The petitioners are the defendants in the suit in O.S.No.490 of 2009, which was filed by the respondent for specific performance based on a contract entered into between the petitioners and the respondent. The suit was decreed on 29.11.2010 and the appeal filed by the petitioners before the I Additional District Court, Madurai in A.S.No.3 of 2011 was also dismissed on 23.08.2011.

3. By claiming that the respondent/ decree holder neither paid the decree amount nor deposited the amount before the Court, the petitioners/ judgment debtors filed an application in I.A.No.789 of 2015 to rescind the contract as per Section 28 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963, before the learned Principal Sub Judge, Madurai and

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top