SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Mad) 3656

D. BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY
Raja Venkatesh – Appellant
Versus
F. Ebenesar Rathna Kumar – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant:R.U. Dinesh Rajkumar, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

(Prayer: Criminal Appeal is filed under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, pleased to set aside the order of acquittal dated 12.11.2018 passed in Criminal Appeal No.58 of 2016 by the Learned Principal Sessions Judge, Tiruvallur and to confirm the order dated 20.09.2016 passed in S.T.C.No.177 of 2015 by the Learned Judicial Magistrate Court, Fast Track Judge, Magisterial Level No.II, Poonamalee, Tiruvallur District.)

1. This Criminal Appeal is against the acquittal, filed by the complainant in a private complaint alleging the offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

2. The complaint filed by the complainant was taken on file in S.T.C.No.17 of 2015, on the file of the Fast Track Magisterial Level – II, Poonamalee, Thiruvallur District.

3. Upon furnishing copies as per Section 207 of Cr.P.C., and upon questioning under Section 313 of Cr.P.C., the accused denied the allegation and stood trial.

4. On behalf of the complainant, the complainant examined himself as P.W.1 and the Bank Manager of Indian Bank, Valasaravakkam was examined as P.W.2 and Ex.P-1 to Ex.P-11 were marked.

5. Thereupon, when the accused was questioned about the mater

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top