Back
SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY
Madhamma – Appellant
Versus
Official Liquidator, High Court of Madras – Respondent
ORDER :
Prayer: in C.A. Nos. 301 and 302 of 2021: This Application is filed under Order XIV, Rule 8 of O.S. Rules 1956 r/w Rule 9 and 11(b) of the Company Rules, 1959 praying to set aside/cancel the sale dated 07.08.2017 vide Document No. 3023 of 2017 at SRO, Soolagiri, Krishnagiri District, executed by the first respondent, in his capacity as the provisional liquidator of the M/s. Maxworth Orchards India Limited, the respondent in the company petition, in favour of the third respondent, in so far as the properties measuring an extent of 3.5445 acres in Survey Nos. 157/2B and 0.2594 acres in Survey No. 157/2A, totally 3.80 acres, in Seluvandoddi Village, Hosur Taluk, Krishnagiri District, being the item Nos. 25 and 26 of the schedule thereof based on the order dated 16.12.2013 passed by this Court in C.A. No. 579 to 584 of 2013 in C.P. No. 57 of 1998.
1. These applications are presented by applicants claiming title to lands ad-measuring 3.5445 acres in Survey No. 157/2B and 0.2594 acres in Survey No. 157/2A, at Seluvandoddi Village, Hosur Taluk, Krishnagiri District.
2. In Company Application No. 301 of 2021, the applicant seeks to set aside or cancel the sale deed dated 07.08.2017 be
None of the provided case law snippets contain explicit language indicating that they have been overruled, reversed, or abrogated.
The following cases are grouped together as they represent a series of procedural orders and directives issued by the Court of Madras regarding the liquidation of Maxworth Orchards (India) Limited. They are consistent with one another, focusing on the appointment of the Official Liquidator and the execution of sale certificates. * **Maxworth Orchards (India) Limited VS Koduru Venkateswara Prasad, S/o (Late) Subramanyeswara Rao - 2024 0 Supreme(Mad) 2110 Limited VS Koduru Venkateswara Prasad, S/o (Late) Subramanyeswara Rao - 2024 0 Supreme(Mad) 2110](https://supremetoday.ai/doc/judgement/02100152369))**: Establishes the appointment of the Official Liquidator as the provisional liquidator via order dated 17.09.2010. * **S.V.Srinivasulu vs Official Liquidator, High Court, Madras - 2025 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 58(MAD) 58](https://supremetoday.ai/doc/judgement/02100154893))**: Discusses the confirmation of sale in favor of the 3rd respondent based on previous court orders. * **S.V.Srinivasulu vs Official Liquidator, High Court, Madras - 2025 0 Supreme(Mad) 4005 4005](https://supremetoday.ai/doc/judgement/02100154740))**: Contains identical content to S.V.Srinivasulu vs Official Liquidator, High Court, Madras - 2025 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 58(MAD) 58](https://supremetoday.ai/doc/judgement/02100154893)) regarding the confirmation of sale and the role of the Official Liquidator. * **S.Jayanthi vs Official Liquidator, High Court Madras. As Provisional Liquidator of Maxworth Orchards (India) Limited - 2025 0 Supreme(Mad) 4017 Limited - 2025 0 Supreme(Mad) 4017](https://supremetoday.ai/doc/judgement/02100154752))**: Directs the Official Liquidator to hand over physical possession and confirms the execution of a sale certificate dated 27.05.2022. * **S. Mahendran vs Official Liquidator, High Court of Madras - 2025 0 Supreme(Mad) 4255 4255](https://supremetoday.ai/doc/judgement/02100154990))**: Reaffirms the 17.09.2010 appointment and directs the mutation of title and revenue records. * ****: Reaffirms the 17.09.2010 appointment and directs the conclusion of auction sales for properties.
* **Suraj Lamp & Industries Pvt. Ltd. VS State of Haryana - 2011 6 Supreme 737)**: This case serves as a statement of legal principle regarding the transfer of immovable property. It establishes the requirement for a registered deed of conveyance and clarifies that SA/GPA/WILL transactions do not convey title. It acts as a foundational legal standard rather than a procedural order.
None. The provided snippets are either procedural directives within the same liquidation matter or a statement of established legal principle. There is no evidence of conflicting judicial treatment or ambiguity regarding their current status.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
