SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Mad) 405

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S.M. SUBRAMANIAM, J.
Subramaniam – Petitioner
Versus
Chitra – Respondent
C.R.P. No. 229 of 2023, C.M.P. Nos. 1886, 1889 of 2023
Decided On : 03-02-2023

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: C.S. Saravanan.

Headnote:

Constitution of India, 1949 - Article 227 - Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act 2005 - Section 3 – Power of Superintendence of all courts by High Court - Women from Domestic Violence - Civil Revision Petition is filed to strike revision petitioner is father-in-law of first respondent complainant who instituted a domestic violence proceedings file of Judicial Magistrate Court – Held, Case first respondent/complainant raised several allegations which all are to be inquired into by competent Court - Mere statement before this Court that petitioner has not committed any such offence would be insufficient to strike off complaint itself petitioner is at liberty to defend case before Court concerned - Civil Revision Petition stands dismissed.

ORDER :

Prayer: This Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to call for the records pertaining to DVA No. 2 of 2022 pending on the file of the Learned Judicial Magistrate Court, Dharapuram and strike out the petitioners name and the same as abuse process of law and by allowing the present Civil Revision Petition.

1. The Civil Revision Petition is filed to strike off DVA No. 2 of 2022. The revision petitioner is the father-in-law of the first respondent/complainant who instituted a domestic violence proceedings in DVA No. 2 of 2022 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate Court at Darapuram.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner states that the marriage between the first respondent/complainant and the son of the revision petitioner was solemnised on 17.02.2019 and unfortunately, the son of the revision petitioner died on 19.04.2021. Regarding the settlement of the service benefits of the deceased employee, the revision petitioner claims certain benefits and the first respondent/complainant also claims the service benefits of her deceased husband to be settled in her favour in entirety. That apart, further allegations are also raised with reference to the conduct of the revision petitioner as father-in-law. The learned counsel for the petitioner states that there is no dowry harassment or demand of money from the first respondent complainant and thus, the DV proceeding is not maintainable and is to be striked off.

3. This Court is of the considered opinion that the revision petitioner has misconstrued the scope of the provisions of the Protection of the Women from Domestic Violence Act 2005, Section 3 provides definition of domestic violence extracted as under:

    3. Definition of domestic violence - For the purposes of this Act, any act, omission or commission or conduct of the respondent shall constitute domestic violence in case it:

(a) harms or injures or endangers the health, safety, life, limb or well-being, whether mental or physical, of the aggrieved person or tends to do so and includes causing physical abuse, sexual abuse, verbal and emotional abuse and economic abuse.

(b) harasses, harms, injures or endangers the aggrieved person with a view to coerce her or any other person related to her to meet any unlawful demand for any dowry or other property or valuable security.

(c) has the effect of threatening the aggrieved person or any person related to her by any conduct mentioned in clause (a) or clause (b).

(d) otherwise injures or causes harm, whether physical or mental, to the aggrieved person.

Explanation I: For the purposes of this section:

(i) “physical abuse” means any act or conduct which is of such a nature as to cause bodily pain, harm, or danger to life, limb, or health or impair the health or development of the aggrieved person and includes assault, criminal intimidation and criminal force.

(ii) “sexual abuse” includes any conduct of a sexual nature that abuses, humiliates, degrades or otherwise violates the dignity of woman.

(iii) “verbal and emotional abuse” includes:

(a) insults, ridicule, humiliation, name calling and insults or ridicule specially with regard to not having a child or a male child.

(b) repeated threats to cause physical pain to any person in whom the aggrieved person is interested.

(iv) “economic abuse” includes:

(a) deprivation of all or any economic or financial resources to which the aggrieved person is entitled under any law or custom whether payable under an order of a court or otherwise or which the aggrieved person requires out of necessity including, but not limited to, household necessities for the aggrieved person and her children, if any, stridhan, property, jointly or separately owned by the aggrieved person, payment of rental related to the shared household and maintenance.

(b) disposal of household effects, any alienation of assets whether movable or immovable, valuables, shares, securities, bonds and the like or other property in which the aggrieved per

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top