IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
N. Anand Venkatesh, J.
Dr. Sri Hari Vignesh R. - Petitioner
Versus
The State of Tamil Nadu Rep. By its Principal Secretary Health and Family Welfare Departments and ors. – Respondents
W.P.Nos. 1571, 1574, 1774, 1588, 1575, 1576, 1577, 1578, 1579, 1580, 1581, 1582, 1584, 1585, 1587, 1589, 1591, 1592 and 1594 of 2023 and WWP Nos.1663, 1665, 1671, 1673, 1887, 1888, 1696, 1697, 1672, 1674, 1676, 1680, 1679, 1681, 1675, 1677, 1678, 1682, 1683, 1684, 1685, 1686, 1687, 1689, 1688, 1691, 1690, 1692, 169 3, 1695, 1698, 1699, 1700, 1701, 1703, 1706, 1702 and 1705 of 2023
Decided On : 06-02-2023
Constitution of India, 1949 – Article, 226 – Power of High Court to issue Certain Writs – Affidavit – Health and Preventive Medicine – Petitioners in all these writ petitions are doctors who have completed their post-graduation in various specialities and they have knocked doors of this Court questioning appointment/posting orders – Held, Court should be more focused on rendering their services to poor people and helping Government and Medical Department to upgrade available facilities attitude with which doctors are expected to render their services – PG doctors cannot be heard to say that they will work only if all facilities are available not Gods waste their time in litigation – Court does not find any ground to interfere with appointment posting order issued by Director of Public Health and Preventive Medicine – Writ petitions stand dismissed.
ORDER :
The petitioners in all these writ petitions are doctors, who have completed their post-graduation in various specialities and they have knocked the doors of this Court questioning the appointment/posting orders issued by the Director of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, all dated 27.12.2022.
2. When these writ petitions came up for admission on 23.01.2023, the following order was passed by this Court:
The main grievance that has been expressed by the petitioners in all these writ petitions is that they have completed their post graduation and they are expected to render their compulsory service for the period under taken in the bond. There was an earlier round of litigation and in WP No.31089 of 2022, this Court made it very clear that insofar as those PG doctors whose services are to be utilised, the same must be commensurate with their qualification either in the Head Quarters hospital or in the hospitals attached with the medical college in the State of Tamil Nadu or in any other hospital where such kind of service is required and therefore, according to the petitioners, the type of work that is going to be allotted to the PG doctors must commensurate with the qualification and specialisation which they have achieved after undergoing the post graduation. The grievance of the petitioners is that they have all been en masse sent to various primary health centres across the Tamil Nadu. Hence, according to the petitioners such a decision taken by the respondents runs against the submission made before this Court and the directions issued by this Court. The learned counsel for petitioner has also relied upon various other judgements in order to substantiate this stand taken by the petitioner.
2. Mr.Stalin Abhimanu, learned Additional Government Pleader seeks time to take instructions. Post these cases under the same caption on 25.01.2023.
3. The Director of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, has filed a common counter affidavit in all these writ petitions. The particulars of the appointment/posting order given to the petitioners has been tabulated and for proper understanding, the same is extracted here under:
| Sl. | Name of the Institution | Name of the Candidate | Name of the PG Course & Completed Academic Year | W.P. No | Name of the Opted Primary Health Centre | Name of the Attached Upgraded Primary Health Centre | Name of the Health Unit District |
| 1. | Madras Medical College, Chennai | Dr.Sri Hari Vignesh R | MD Anesthesiology 2021 | 1571/2023 | Sokkanur Additional PHC | Nallathipalla yam Upgraded PHC | Coimbatore |
| 2. | Madras Medical College, Chennai | Dr.Leena S | MS Ophthalmology 2021 | 1576/2023 | Chettipalayam Additional PHC | Arisipalayam Upgraded PHC | Coimbatore |
| 3. | Thanjavur Medical College, Thanjavur | Dr.Sruthi. S | MS Ophthalmology 2021 | 1588/2023 | Periyakayapak kam Additional PHC | Idaikazhiinaadu Upgraded PHC | Chengalpet |
| 4. | Madurai Medical College | Dr.E. Dheenadh ayalan | MS (Ortho) 2022 | 1574/2023 | Puduchatiram Upgraded PHC | Puduchatiram Upgraded PHC | Cuddalore |
| 5. | Chengalpattu Medical College, Chengalpattu | Dr.A. Shobana Priya | MS Ophthalmology 2022 | 1575/2023 | Attupakkam Additional PHC | Punnai Upgraded]PHC | Ranipet |
| 6. | Coimbatore Medical College, Coimbatore | Dr. J. Gowthami | MC Microbiology 2022 | 1577/2023 | Malayampalayam Additional PHC | Nambiyur Upgraded PHC | Erode |
| 7. | Thanjavur Medical College, Thanjavur | Dr.K. Raghuman | MS Ophthalmology 2022 | 1578/2023 | Ammur Additional PHC | Lalapet Upgraded PHC | Ranipet |
| 8. | Thanjavur Medical College Thanjavur | Dr.M.Sudan | MS Ophthalmology 2022 | 1579/2023 | Muthur Upgraded PHC | Muthur Upgraded PHC | Tiruppur |
| 9. | Stanley Medical College, Chennai | Dr.G. Thiruvaranga prasath | MD Anesthesiology 2022 | 1580/2023 | Thellar Upgraded PHC | Thellar Upgraded PHC | Cheyyar |
| 10. | |||||||
SupremeToday
Compulsory bond service for medical graduates is legally justified as a condition for subsidized education, and allocations to Primary Health Centres align with public health needs.
The judgment emphasizes the principle of equality before the law and the rational nexus between the basis of classification and the object intended to be achieved, as established in the 1952 AIR 75 c....
Completion of Super Speciality does not entitle petitioners to redesignation as Assistant Professors without sanctioned posts and selection processes, as they are bound by executed bonds for one year....
Executing bonds for post-graduate medical service requires adherence to conditions specified without exceptions for pandemic duties, reaffirming contractual obligations under Article 19(1)(g).
The condition of mandatory service of four/five years as provided in Clauses 6.1 and 11.1.2 of the 2019 Policy is unreasonable.
Transfer of government servants is governed by exigencies of service, and individuals cannot claim specific postings, especially regarding teaching designations without meeting established criteria.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the transfer and posting of the petitioner should have been governed by the existing policies and guidelines, including the Cadre Review Order....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.