SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Mad) 635

S. SOUNTHAR
Ghanshyam Hemdev – Appellant
Versus
Bharathi Raja – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Plaintiff:K. Harishankar, Advocate. For the Respondent:R. Prabhakaran, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

(Prayer: Civil Suit is filed under Order IV Rule 1 of the Original Side Rules, 1956 and order VII Rule 1 of CPC r/w Section 55 and 62 of the Indian Copyright Act 1957 r/w Section 2(1) (c) (xvii) first proviso to Section 7 of the Commercial Courts, Commercial Division and Commercial Appellate Division of High Courts Act, 2015, praying to,

(i) Declaring that the plaintiff is the absolute owner of all the Internet and digital copyright as set out in the agreement dated 16.06.2014 and Addendum agreement dated 16.06.2014 in the plaint schedule mentioned cinematograph films;

(ii) For a permanent injunction restraining the defendants, their men, agents, servants or persons acting on their behalf or claiming through them from in any manner infringing or interfering with the plaintiff''s Internet and digital copyright exploitation in the plaint schedule mentioned cinematograph films;

(ii) costs of the suit;

(iii) Passing such other order or orders as this Court may deem fit in the circumstances of the case.)

1. The present suit is filed by the plaintiff seeking declaration that he is the absolute owner of the Internet and Digital copyrights of the plaint schedule cinematograph films as s

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top