SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Mad) 693

G. JAYACHANDRAN
Anand Rao – Appellant
Versus
State The Inspector of Police, Chennai – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant:B. Kumar, Senior Counsel, S. Ramachandran, Advocate. For the Respondent:K. Srinivasan, Senior Advocate & Special Public Prosecutor [CBI]

JUDGMENT

(Prayer: Criminal Appeal is filed under Section 374 (2) r/w.382 of Cr.P.C., praying to admit this Criminal Appeal on file, call for the records in C.C.No.5 of 2006 on the file of the learned XI Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge [CBI Cases Relating To Banks And Financial Institutions, Chennai-1, set aside the finding and sentence passed in the said case, acquit this appellant of the charges from the said case.)

1. The appellant herein is the 1st accused in C.C.No.5 of 2006 on the file of XI Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge [CBI Cases Relating To Banks And Financial Institutions, Chennai-1.

2. The appellant (A1) along with one Balakrishnan (A2), proprietor of M/s.Bala International, Karur were tried by the Trial Court for the following charges:-

    (i) Under Section 120-B r/w 409, 420 IPC and substantive offences of 420 IPC and Section 13(2) r/w, 13(1) (c) & (d) of PC Act, 1988 against A1 and A2.

    (ii) Under Section 420 IPC against A1.

    (iii) Under Section 409 IPC against A1

    (iv) Section 13(2) r/w










































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top